User talk:MsSMarie

June 2021

Hello, I'm Notfrompedro. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pierre Kory, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:34, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

I have added more references every time I made changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.180.68.6 (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, MsSMarie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Alexbrn (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MsSMarie reported by User:Notfrompedro (Result: ). Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Pierre Kory. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

You seem intent on repeated reversions of edits by other editors. You know what the consequences can be; it strikes me as likely that you will soon experience more of them. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I don't know what you're talking about. I have made one edit in 18 hours, and I also discussed the edit extensively before making it. This is very threatening and uncalled for. MsSMarie (talk) 16:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)MsSMarie

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

Hey Marie, I believe posterity will show us to be right. Though I see it as rather pointless continuing to fight these clowns. I think we should just conclude Wikipedia as being worthless and go on with our lives for now. In the meantime hop on Reddit and have a sane discussion: https://www.reddit.com/r/ivermectin/ ColourScreen (talk) 19:39, 14 June 2021 (UTC) I should also mention that Michael Capuzzo who has been nominated for the Pullitzer Prize six times, has issued a plea to his colleagues for fairer coverage. This should hopefully move the insane media narrative and so the media loving clowns will probably fix the article themselves. ColourScreen (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC) ColourScreen (talk) 20:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txTHjZS41aA Pulling this link off Wikipedia is gross negligence. ColourScreen (talk) 20:38, 14 June 2021 (UTC) https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/The-Drug-that-Cracked-Covid-by-Michael-Capuzzo.pdfColourScreen (talk) 21:06, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abuse of our processes, see [1] for details. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bishonen | tålk 20:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

A late notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2021 (UTC)