User talk:Mrushbenton
Certain Wikipedia users are making uninformed (and most likely false) statements that you would like the Wealthtrust article to be deleted. Is this true? It seems unlikely that you'd do all the hard work of making the article just to want it deleted, and since you've never posted anything suggesting you do it's seems even more unlikely.
Please tell me if you want it deleted or not. You can edit this page (click the button at the top) and write in your reply.
Thanks!
--PEAR 20:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Yeah i actually would like for it to be deleted. It is my first time to try and edit or create an article and i originally did not think that what i put up would be grounds for deletion. I just tried to experiment by creating a small page about an investment firm in nashville, but i thought i could remove it. It would be great if it could be deleted and i appreciate your concern. Thanks.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrushbenton (talk • contribs)
- But I want to keep the article =(
I would rather get rid of it considering the ramifications of having that comapny's name on the net with a big deltion notice attached to it. It makes them look bad and they had nothing to do with the page. sorry.
Proposed deletion of WealthTrust
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article WealthTrust, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- This is essentially a new page replacing the prior redirect. It has little content and no evidence of notability. Content consists solely of the opening paragraph from the company's web site (http://wealthtrust.com/). Press coverage appears to consist only of routine business activity and transactions.
An earlier PROD resulted in a redirect to Morgan Keegan & Company, but WealthTrust is no longer affiliated with that company, so restoring the earlier redirect is not advisable.
Related page: If this page is deleted, the Weathtrust redirect page should also be deleted. (Does this need to be a separate PROD?)
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tcncv (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Nomination of WealthTrust for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WealthTrust is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WealthTrust (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AllyD (talk) 14:50, 29 January 2018 (UTC)