User talk:Mrs frizzle and arnold
Welcome!
|
i improved an article
Speedy deletion nomination of Riley colton unger
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Riley colton unger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Everymorning talk 00:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fruit preserves. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:00, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Laryngitis, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at George Darby. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 00:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Block
[edit]We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of your user talk page. Diannaa (talk) 00:19, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Mrs frizzle and arnold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i want to be unblocked because i had a heart and wanted to joke around with you i wanted wraps to be sandwitch wrap because you said sandwich wrap and i pretended that kari isnt there i wanted to cerate an article Mrs frizzle and arnold (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your last day of edits consisted of nothing but child-like vandalism. This request does not seem to be coherent. Kuru (talk) 15:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mrs frizzle and arnold (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i was joking around dont decline it can you take a joke admins beecause in just pretending i promise to never do it again Mrs frizzle and arnold (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sure you were joking - and we blocked you to prevent you from "joking" further, because you evidently don't understand what an encyclopedia is. Max Semenik (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
June 2015
[edit](block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.