User talk:Mrs. U. I. O. P., Mr. O'. de la Qwerty

You are blocked indefinitely as a sock of Tom Sayle. Even if by some chance, you are not Tom Sayle, our username policy suggests that this name is not a good one, as it is too hard to type. As with your last sock, O'delanca, repeated protestations of innocence with no corroborating evidence will merely result in your page being locked. ++Lar: t/c 14:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mrs. U. I. O. P., Mr. O'. de la Qwerty (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not Tom Sayle, but unfortunately, I can't find any evidence to back my claims as I've only made 5 edits, this being my 6th; if you can find me the evidence to claim that I am Tom Sayle, please tell me so I can work from that. As for my username, well, I'll put in a request to change it once we've all agreed that I am not that user.

Decline reason:

It seems quite obvious that you are not a new user, given your level of familiarity with Wikipedia. If you aren't Tom Sayle, perhaps you could say who you are? Mango juice^talk 16:31, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: someone using your address has admitted to being Tom Sayle. Page locked indefinitely. Mango juice^talk 16:35, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]