User talk:Mrlodotcom

N!xau

Please explain why you keep adding a Chinese name to N!xau. He is not a Chinese actor, nor is his main area of renown China, so there is no point adding one; the Wikipedia standard is not to give a Chinese translation for every person there is, but only to do so where it makes sense (for people who are Chinese or who are famous mainly in China). If readers want to find out what people in China call N!xau, they can click the Chinese interwiki link at the bottom of the left-hand toolbar on that page. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 20:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK Mrlodotcom (talk) 23:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. Happy editing :) rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 23:24, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ethan Li

A tag has been placed on Ethan Li requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 23:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lawrence Yu Kam-kee

A tag has been placed on Lawrence Yu Kam-kee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tckma (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He is a very notable person in Hong Kong. Please do not place the remove tag indiscriminately without doing any researches. Thanks. ♥Mrlodotcom♥ 18:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Lawrence Yu Kam-kee

Hi there Mrlodotcom! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Lawrence Yu Kam-kee. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Lawrence Yu Kam-kee, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 18:10, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Yapp Hung Fai

Hello Mrlodotcom, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Yapp Hung Fai - a page you tagged - because: Playing for a notable team indicates importance/significance. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. So Why 07:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK Mrlodotcom Talk contribs 07:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Ngoo

The article Michael Ngoo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not yet played at full professional level, therefore does not yet meet WP:ATHLETE requirements

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gonzonoir (talk) 08:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK Mrlodotcom Talk contribs 09:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Yam Wai Hung

The article Yam Wai Hung has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

all biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Giant Snowman 17:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]