User talk:Mrclever2248

September 2016

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons you might want to). ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Feta, you may be blocked from editing. Constantine ✍ 18:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of El Makarna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Makarna is for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should've beendeleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Makarna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --T*U (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Callanecc. I noticed that in this edit to Ali Campbell, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:51, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Rakı. Jdcomix (talk) 18:35, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ali Campbell. Egghead06 (talk) 20:11, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]