User talk:Mraandthebigbrother
New Article Naming
[edit]Note:Chinese Users talk here.
Coming soon I'll make an article on this man on the right. This man is a Cantonese, so:
Chen Yang or Chan Yueng? Hope Everyone has it's opinion!
-Mr a-(Contact)-(Contrib) 03:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
- Chen Yang. He was born in mainland China and is holding Chinese citizenship. --Alexchen4836 (talk) 08:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Chen Yang is used with Cantonese spellings.-Mr a-(Contact)-(Contrib) 13:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Making changes without explation
[edit]Please do not make changes without explaining why you are doing them. Thanks, Theleftorium (talk) 17:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- I Don't explain because you see it on your talk page about this. --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 01:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Do not remove images from the Simpsons episode articles again. You have to have a valid reason for doing that. The images are perfectly relevant, make the article more appealing, help readers identify the guest star, and their inclusion doesn't violate any of Wikipedia's policies. Theleftorium (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- I can call adding a guest pic is what we called in Chinese: Bu Hexie (Means "Uncoordinated") and Bu Haokan(Mean "Looks Bad") (If you know Chinese, you can search those words on Google to see the exact words). Also it will made articles more excessive. --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 12:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- The images don't make the articles look bad in my opinion. An article without images = a boring article. Theleftorium (talk) 13:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- "Boring" but with out pic can be more informative. That's the lesson I learned from Mircoblogging Content Farm. Better Add official promo pic rather than guest star pic. --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 03:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- The official promos are copyrighted, while the images of the guest stars are free. Including an image of the guest star does not make the article less informative – if anything it makes it more informative. Theleftorium (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- I still think This situation right now(guest pic) is Uncoordinated, less informative and more like Showbiz news sites. **** you, and talk's off! --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 15:30, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- The official promos are copyrighted, while the images of the guest stars are free. Including an image of the guest star does not make the article less informative – if anything it makes it more informative. Theleftorium (talk) 10:23, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- "Boring" but with out pic can be more informative. That's the lesson I learned from Mircoblogging Content Farm. Better Add official promo pic rather than guest star pic. --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 03:16, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- The images don't make the articles look bad in my opinion. An article without images = a boring article. Theleftorium (talk) 13:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
- I can call adding a guest pic is what we called in Chinese: Bu Hexie (Means "Uncoordinated") and Bu Haokan(Mean "Looks Bad") (If you know Chinese, you can search those words on Google to see the exact words). Also it will made articles more excessive. --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 12:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Demonstrating Notability
[edit]Following up on your edit comment on AcFun: it isn't enough to say that an article subject is notable, what is needed is reliable 3rd party references in the article itself that demonstrate that Notability. So if you have these to hand, please add them. (There is a guide to referencing at WP:REFBEGIN which may be useful.) AllyD (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
- Can you find some better material references? Blogs are generally not reliable sources: see the WP:USERG section on the Reliable Sources page that I referred you to. AllyD (talk) 07:56, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- That blog link is the official blog of New Weekly Magazine. --Mr a (talk) (contrib) 13:24, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:NBC Nightly News titlecard.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:NBC Nightly News titlecard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:49, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:AcFun logo.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:AcFun logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
