User talk:Mr manor11

Welcome!

Hi Mr manor11! I noticed your contributions to User talk:Zoozaz1 and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Zoozaz1 (talk) 23:13, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 07:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you continue to remove sources considered as reliable, expect to be blocked

See WP:RSNP, eg "There is consensus that news broadcast or published by CNN is generally reliable. However, iReport consists solely of user-generated content, and talk show content should be treated as opinion pieces. Some editors consider CNN biased, though not to the extent that it affects reliability." Doug Weller talk 07:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 02:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? I removed a single word, as it was repetitive in the article and reused later in the paragraph?

That's not disruptive, it's forcing a dual set of standards only applied to certain targets.

That's your opinion and your opinion about it has been challenged on the talk page. I see you also marked that edit as WP:Minor although it wasn't. Doug Weller talk 14:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A. No, I was acting objectively, and applying a uniform standard for everyone, while the others (Who were obviously biased and called fox News "Far-Right") insisted it only be done for anything remotely conservative.

I only wanted to ensure both liberal and conservative articles get the same good faith, instead of getting marked instantly with a label as they are now. Mr manor11 (talk) 14:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, its a single repetitive word I removed, how is it not minor? Mr manor11 (talk) 14:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're working in topic areas where editors are required to understand content and behavioral policies. I suggest you work on other topics until you can find the time to become far more familiar with those policies. Otherwise, you're at a huge disadvantage when attempting to work in those topic areas, and are at risk of a block or ban for reasons that you don't understand. --Hipal (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't understand, does Wikipedia require unfair advantage to left ideology with "Content and behavior" policy?

Tell me exactly what reasons it is unfair to depict all media equally, and why I must name call center-right news, while preventing such from happening to hyper-partisan communist networks like Mother Jones.

Look carefully at User_talk:Mr_manor11#Important_Notice. Good luck. --Hipal (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Libertarian Party (Argentina), please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it.

The *Show preview* button is right next to the *Publish changes* button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 05:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What page in the arab-Israeli conflict did I edit?

I made an edit request since I cannot edit myself.

Even so, thank you. Mr manor11 (talk) 17:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best to know the rules (WP:ARBECR), even for edit requests (WP:EDITXY). And yw :) Selfstudier (talk) 17:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just out of curiousity, how did you get into the Israel-Arab issue? Mr manor11 (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long story that. Selfstudier (talk) 18:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I dont mean to pry sorry, but I would love to know! Mr manor11 (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]