User talk:Mr etre

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mr etre! I am Acps110 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Additionally, here's a great tutorial on how to become a great Wikipedian.

Acps110 ^{(talk • contribs)} 01:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Route M4 (Manhattan)

The article Route M4 (Manhattan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Individual bus routes are usually not notable enough for separate articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MY PICTURE

this

{{unblock-auto reviewed|207.237.8.187|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "I am not creative i won't harm you". The reason given for I am not creative i won't harm you's block is: "[[WP:Vandalism-only acc|MuZemike|decline=It is clear that you are the same user as "I am not creative i won't harm you"; hence, you are now directly blocked as a sock puppet. –MuZemike 00:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)}}[reply]

this

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr etre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't make unconstructive edits again

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr etre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

now i get how you get edit and will never be a sockpuppet again cause before i didn't know that u can be block

Decline reason:

The vandalism under the other account name has sufficed to get you blocked, period. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 05:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Users may not remove declined unblock requests while they are still blocked, please leave the declined requests here. You should be requesting unblock through your original account anyway, we almost never unblock sockpuppet accounts. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:59, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]