User talk:Mr John Miller
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hoerbiger Holding AG.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:45, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hoerbiger Holding AG.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:48, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
My submission "HOERBIGER Holding AG"
[edit]Dear Excirial,
thank you for your reply. Please, can you specify the passages in text, where more reliable sources will be necessary? As an example, the introduction: Who else but the company itself can provide information about financial figures or the number of employees? Regarding history, i think we agree to each other, that no free newspaper or the like would publish a whole company history. Nevertheless Hoerbiger Holding should not only have a record in German Wikipedia, because the group has thousands of workers round the globe who only speak English.
So can you help me and tell, which sources would find your acceptance?
Thank you in advance!
Direct link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Hoerbiger_Holding_AG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr John Miller (talk • contribs) 10:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hiyas there John,
- To put it rather bluntly: The entire article actually needs reliable sources since all the sources inside the article were written by the company, or they were press releases written by another company. As mentioned, reliable sources pass the following criteria:
- It is of sufficient size
- It can be trusted
- It is independent of the subject of the article
- The currently added sources all fail the third criteria, since they were written by the subject or someone close to subject.
- Examples of reliable sources would be quality newspapers such as the New York times, Major magazines, News websites, University published books and so on. Right now the article only contains self-publised sources, blogs, a wikipedia article and a webshop, and none of these pass the above criteria. Primary sources may only be used to verify trivial information such as Employee count, Current CEO and similar non debatable static information. However, an article may not be based entirely on primary sources, quite the opposite actually. A few primary sources for minor data as above is allowed, but the rest must be cited with secondary sources
- Besides being used to verify the article content reliable sources are also the basis for the notability criteria that determines if a subject is important enough to be on Wikipedia. Sans reliable sources it fails the general notability guideline, which means that reliable sources are actually a requirement in each and every case. I would advice looking around for reliable sources first - for a company this size at least something must have been published in a newspaper or magazine (Which wasn't sponsored by the company)? I would also recommend using an article from the good article list as an example for writing your own article, as these are checked and found to be of good quality - thus making excellent examples for writing your own article.Personally i tend to recommend Pearson's Candy Company and Pike Place Fish Market since they are well written, decently sourced and most importantly not overly long. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 12:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hoerbiger Holding AG, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Hoerbiger Holding AG
[edit]
Hello Mr John Miller. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Hoerbiger Holding AG.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hoerbiger Holding AG}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 17:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)