User talk:Mr Creasy/Archive 1

Message

Hi there; just for the record, having looked at a recent edit of yours, please be advised that user:Meateater is not an admin. Also for the record, should you need any help, I am one. It is also true that I told him to desist from posting irrelevant comments on the page of the user you mention some five days ago, since when he not done so. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 11:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks Anthony, i cannot post a message on your talk page because i am blocked again. But thanks for the response, i just asssumed user:meateater was an admin because he acts like one but i appreciate you taking the time to correct me on that, i will drop you a message if i need any help (of course that is if i am ever allowed to edit again!). Thanks. Mr Creasy 22:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, and...

I am no admin, and I don't know who you think you are, but this matter is of no concern to you, and you have no right to tell me how to behave/act on wikipedia. Now, leave me alone, and never talk to me again. Meateater 16:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Wow, that has got to be the most hypocritical thing i have heard for a while!! Now i know the kind of person i am dealing with. How can you dare to even tell me that how you behave on Wikipedia is no concern to me when for the last week i have had nothing but warning after warning from you? To be honest when i have been blocked from editing twice, and even blocked from editing my own talk page because of you making complaints about me i think it is everything to do with me when i find a post where you told someone to "Fuck Off". Ever hear a story about throwing stones in glass houses? you would do well to remember that next time you decide to get smart with another user. And yes a bit lame having to reply on my own talk page but as you have got me blocked again i do not have much choice!!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr Creasy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to know why have i been blocked again? because i complained about being blocked from editing my own talk page? (This was my IP talk page - User talk:58.167.213.128) Are you not allowed to complain to wiki admins now? See the comment from user: maneater above, he has been harrasing me, getting me blocked, filling my IP user page with warnings etc.. and everytime i try to get an explanation i get blocked from responding, so he has free reign over my talk page. This is ridiculous to be honest and i cannot believe i have been blocked again. Also, why is there no warning or indication that i am blocked on this talk page??, thanks. And also, if meateater is not an Admin then why is he running around putting warning notices on peoples talk pages threatening them with bans? Also why when he says i am blocked am i blocked? How does he do this if he is not an Admin?

Decline reason:

Not currently blocked, at least not directly. — Yamla 22:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2007

If you require help with archiving a talk page then please post a comment here.--Just James ^T/C 04:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and archived the talk page for you.--Just James ^T/C 04:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Excuse me?? Who are you telling me what i can and cannot do with my talk page? I am sick to death of jumped up people on wikipedia telling me what i can and cannot do!! I do not need help archiving my page thankyou very much - though it would have been much easier had you not reverted my changed whilst i was still in the process of making them. What right have you got to go around undoing changes while i am still making them? Remove the warning notice from this talk page now and stop messing with the talk page while i am still trying to edit it. Mr Creasy 05:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

You completely wiped the conversations on the talk page. That's not the way you archive a talk page. First, you place [[/Archive1]] on the talk page, then you cut the conversation text from the talk page. Then you save the talk page, open the archive talk page, paste the conversations and save the archive talk page.--Just James ^T/C 05:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

I was doing just that but had issues because while i was doing it you were reverting my changes, it was my first time archiving a page so maybe took me a little longer to do but it still gives you no bloody right whatsoever to revert my changes and drop a warning without speaking to me - this is bloody ridiculous to be honest - i have had it with nosey, jumped up people on wikipedia who think they know better and cannot even be civil when dealing with what they think is a probem. No, just get the old warning template out, forget manners.

Explain to me what is civil about the comments you have made towards me so far?--Just James ^T/C 05:22, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Explain to me what gives you the right to stamp a warning on someones page without even being civil to ask them why they made the change in question? I may not be civil but i have had enough of this, it is a nightmare trying to edit a page when someone else keeps writing on it, you need to learn to stop, think and ask questions before you start abusing the warnings. I have had a nightmare with user:meateater over this very same thing and has led me to be blocked from editing twice this week just because i am losing my temper with people who should know better.Mr Creasy 05:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

If it hadn't been for your affiliation with the IP address 58.167.213.128 and the fact that you had been previously blocked then I would have asked you (without a warning template) why you blanked the IP talk page. On another note, your temper is not welcome on Wikipedia. If you can't be civil with other users then I guarantee that you will be blocked from editing in the future. Now just drop the issue and go ahead and edit Wikipedia. That's why you're here isn't it?--Just James ^T/C 05:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Look, i am sorry, i do not want to be on here fighting all the time, but it is really hard not to when i am being victimised by a certain editor and when i followed the correct process to complain i end up getting blocked from editing. The prime reason is not a single time did anyone speak to me about my actions, all i got was warnings after warnings and no way to defend myself. There has got to be a better way to keep things civil on wikipedia than allow anyone the right to go stamping warnings on talk pages with no reasons behind it. This really is the behaviour of corrupt police forces in 3rd world dictatorships and there should be no place for it in wikipedia. In the very first instance i was accused of something that could be called libelous and had not way to defend myself, it is extremely frustrating and difficult not to lose my temper. It was unfortunate that you happened to be on the tail of it, but when i saw another warning on my talk page i had just had enough.

An no, i am not sure i want to be here editing anymore, i cannot be bothered with this hassle, it is too much like hard work. Mr Creasy 05:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

IP user talk page

On another note, don't remove the ISP template. This informs Recent Changes Patrollers to the possibility of more than one user per IP address. To avoid this, use your registered account to edit Wikipedia.--Just James ^T/C 05:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)\

I have a fixed IP Address, not that it is any of your business anyway - why do you keep reverting my changes? Do you think i am stupid??

If you were genuinely attempting to archive the talk page then I apologise for interrupting your edits. However, you didn't even use an edit summary and in the Recent Changes section, this appeared to be an act of page blanking. If you want to avoid annoying reversions in the future then please try and follow WP procedures.--Just James ^T/C 05:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Apology accepted and appreciated and next time i will use the edit summary, thank you Mr Creasy 05:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)