User talk:MrProfessorQ

Welcome

Hello, MrProfessorQ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! – Wdchk (talk) 20:45, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I guess noobishness is unavoidable when you're, well, new at something. Thank's for the pointers; i'll make sure to read those before doing anything else. I think this'll be a long-term thing for me, but, at 14, a lot of what I will be doing at first will probably just be making grammatical corrections to typos on articles I read. And I did reader your talk page where it told me to answer here :)

MrProfessorQ (talk) 21:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing grammar and typos would be a great way to start. There is so much that needs fixing – you can make a contribution right away. At the same time, this will give you a chance to snoop around in the wiki markup and gradually figure out how the various elements of a page work. (You can use a sandbox if you want to experiment with anything.) If you don't mind, I'll offer you a tip about fixing typos: if you find something that looks wrong, see if you can figure out which version of English the article uses, before changing it. It's possible that the spelling and grammar might be correct in someone else's English. Or, it could just be wrong …

By the way, thanks for checking my talk page and deciding to reply here. Everyone has their own preferences, but personally I think you'll find a conversation thread is much easier to follow if it's all in one place. – Wdchk (talk) 01:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of a company

Hi. On your user page, you asked (with reference to IObit), "Would notability be at least somewhat justified by the fact that there's an article on a piece of software that they made, SystemCare?". According to WP:CORP, "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." If the company has a product that the Wikipedia community considers notable, it's very likely that the company would have received coverage in appropriate sources. However, the company and its product are two different things, so we would be looking for references about the company itself. Don't be surprised to find spirited discussion about notability. You can see (here) a discussion about Advanced SystemCare. – Wdchk (talk) 02:36, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again

Sort of the answer I expected. I have been to that article, made a small grammatical edit, and suggested a larger edit. One more question; if a user is asking a question in an article's talk page, and you found the answer, do you edit the section that they made and put your answer at the end, or do you make a new section to respond? Suspecting the first one, but just making sure. I did find a user article that I would've thought would cover this, but didn't see mention of it anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrProfessorQ (talk • contribs) 01:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct, no need to make a new section for a reply. Just add your reply, like this one, and indent it with a colon. More colons are used to increase the indent for follow-up replies. You can see examples of this formatting at Help:Introduction to talk pages/Layout. Cheers, – Wdchk (talk) 05:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]