User talk:MrMagoo

Welcome!

Hello, MrMagoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Karm a fist 13:44, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Planá

I'd reverted the edit [1]. I coudn't find any town/village of such name in the region, including spelling alternatives and common prefixes. If this is fictional town it doesn't belong in {{geodis}}.

Also replacing "XYZ District" with "near XYZ" is not always valid, the district (okres) is official administrative unit in the Czech Republic, not sign of vicinity. Pavel Vozenilek 03:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaning up Casino Royale 06

Hey, I'm thinking about dissolving the "Locations" section at this article and transfering its information to a new section on the production of Royale. Most of this information has to do with where the film was shot and there are also some "behind the scenes" aspects to the section (e.g., 007 stage fire) things. Essentially it would be a merging of "Overview of the film" and "Locations." In my head it would start off with EON's aims (i.e., taking Bond back to his roots) then move into the production of the film - thus locations, and finally it's release. Perhaps a subsection of this would be the reboot section. I don't know. I haven't worked it all out, but as someone who practically wrote that locations section, I wanted to know if you thought this was a good idea. After release the article is developed enough that it could become a featured article and if you look at some featured articles they all have a production section. There are a few other things that it would need, but this would be a good start. Just a thought. K1Bond007 00:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:The-Killers-For-Reasons-Unknown.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The-Killers-For-Reasons-Unknown.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A Great Big Sled.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A Great Big Sled.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MrMagoo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]