User talk:MrFranzEnglishDept

This is MrFranzEnglishDept's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schofield & Simms (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Completely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schofield & Simms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MrFranzEnglishDept! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 13:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Schofield & Simms. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of AI-generated text and images

Hello, I'm Belbury. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Belbury (talk) 17:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Schofield & Simms

Apologies, I was trying to play a hoax on one of my English classes by creating a fantastical story about one of their textbooks. Please do delete the page and apologies for taking up your time. MrFranzEnglishDept (talk) 09:08, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you intend to make constructive contributions to this project to write an encyclopedia? 331dot (talk) 09:20, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]