User talk:MrArcAngel

Welcome!

Hello, MrArcAngel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Robert Keiden (talk) 00:07, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MrArcAngel, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi MrArcAngel! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you get some advice on formatting

Greetings, I see you've been adding some articles on French noble families! Your enthusiasm is great, but glancing at your work I see you're still pretty new to Wikipedia formatting. Since standardised format is pretty important on an encyclopedia, I strongly suggest you either (or both) take a look at the tutorial links provided you at the top of this Talk page, and/or come visit at the Teahouse to get answers to any of your questions about how to best polish up your articles.

As an example, at Lords of Brandon, you didn't provide any WP:Categories, which makes it far less likely that anyone will read your article. Fortunately, we have WP:UNCAT, a team of volunteers who rescue uncategorised articles and get them properly filed. So the good news is folks are working to clean things, the bad news is that leaving things out of your formatting makes work for other volunteers. If you can do just a bit of reading up, and/or look over some other articles to see how they're formatted, you'll both save everyone a lot of time, and make your articles more accessible and helpful to more and more people.

Feel free to write me on my Talk page with any questions, MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about House of Pigniol

Hello, MrArcAngel,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether House of Pigniol should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/House of Pigniol .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Batard0 (talk) 19:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Batard0, thanks for letting me know. I'm starting to think that this is not where the discussion is happening. In Brief

   I have just come across 20 volumes of 15th century ancient Latin French, of which I am having to translate using various, probably out of date translation programs, My formatting knowledge is still pretty poor, and I'm trying to improve.

now to find the discussion.

--MrArcAngel (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of House of Mercure

The article House of Mercure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. None of these family members have articles, a listing in an old directory does not give notability, no hits in Google search.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 18:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]