User talk:Mr.sandippaul

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mr.sandippaul. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr.sandippaul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wait, What! Are you serious? What are you talking about? I was not active for two days. Unblock my account.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 20:05, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr.sandippaul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is a big misunderstanding. Please check it out and unblock my account. Someone voted for something I didn't know! But linking my account with her or him is a mistake. Kindly recheck it. Maybe that person intentionally did this to target me.

Decline reason:

It's not a misunderstanding. You're on the same IP address. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:29, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr.sandippaul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, it is a big misunderstanding! That new user has very smartly copied my IP and is using it on a VPN.

Decline reason:

"There must be some misunderstanding / There must be some kind of mistake / I waited in the rain for hours / And you were late ..." And, I'm sure, you finally went back to your place and "I couldn't believe it / He was just leaving!" Seriously, at this point how can you seriously expect anyone, not just us but anyone, to believe this, much less believe you anymore when you've tried and failed with the same unblock request three straight times!!

So, in order to spare another admin the challenge of trying to deny your next unblock request more creatively than I have, I will be ensuring there won't be one since you're clearly not going to be able to do anything better than waste our time (Maybe not yours, but ours is what matters right now). In other words, I will be revoking your talk page access after I save this. Have a nice day. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #79183

is closed. Strike 2! Submitting the same rubbish at UTRS as led to losing talk page access here is sure to yield what result? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: As we all have learned through repeated experience, blocked sock puppeteers are always truthful. 😜 -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:15, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]