User talk:Mr. Storm Eagle

This is Mr. Storm Eagle's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Mr. Storm Eagle, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mr. Storm Eagle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bernard Weintraub

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bernard Weintraub requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 01:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

François Schommer

It would probably be a good idea not to jump on new articles quite so fast. (Dead people is a category?) WQUlrich (talk) 23:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@WQUlrich: yeah it is. I was just trying to categorise the aritcle, but it seems you found a better one. Mr. Storm Eagle (talk) 13:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been editing for ten years, and that's the first time I've seen it. Here's why: [1]. Anyway, my main point was letting the dust settle before you edit a new article, otherwise you and its creator might end up stepping on each other's toes. :) WQUlrich (talk) 20:54, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Storm Eagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account did nothing wrong. It was blocked because someone else vandalized on this public IP address

Decline reason:

This account is blocked directly, not autoblocked due to an IP block. 331dot (talk) 07:47, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Storm Eagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@331dot: of course this isn’t an IP address. This was block because someone else used the public IP address I used to edit yesterday and now the blocking editor thinks I’m that person. I didn’t do anything wrong. Check my edit history

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Storm Eagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just joined three months ago so I don’t know what your talking about

Decline reason:

Seeing as this has been blocked as a sock of a LTA account, I am declining and removing talk page access RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.