User talk:Mr. Guennoun

This is Mr. Guennoun's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nabil Matar (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please also make sure that the draft has at least a minimum of formatting, with headings and wikilinks.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nabil Matar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mr. Guennoun! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mr. Guennoun. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:53, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Bonadea,

Thank you for the feedback on my submission. I’d like to clarify that I have no direct personal or professional connection to Professor Nabil Matar. My interest in creating this article stems from my academic background and my familiarity with his work, which I believe is highly impactful in the field of early modern Christian-Muslim relations. I noticed that despite his significant contributions, Professor Matar does not currently have a Wikipedia page, and I wanted to help address that gap.

In preparing the article, I’ve aimed to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines by using reliable, independent sources, including academic publications, his university profile, and reputable media outlets that discuss his work. My goal is to provide a neutral, well-sourced article that meets Wikipedia’s standards and highlights Professor Matar’s scholarly contributions without any bias or promotional intent.

Thank you again for the guidance. If there are any specific areas where I can improve neutrality or sourcing, I’d be grateful for further advice. Mr. Guennoun (talk) 14:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]