User talk:Mr. Frantz Charles

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Gravity Falls. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:10, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Mr. Frantz Charles, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 06:49, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gravity Falls, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at T.U.F.F. Puppy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jonathanfu (talk) 21:43, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gravity Falls. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Planet Sheen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Continuing to add junk to articles corrupting wikilinks and article format Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you are using browser extension such as StumbleUpon try disabling it before editing again. You are adding unrecognized html code to your edits that end up corrupting articles. If you don't fix this you will be blocked from editing as are you are responsible for your edits even if something in your browser is doing it without your knowledge. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:15, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of Fish Hooks episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Any information about unaired episodes needs to be backed up with a reference. You added credits to a show that the show reference didn't mention. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:30, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Theft Auto (series), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - X201 (talk) 21:27, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Robot and Monster episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Webclient101 (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of The Amazing World of Gumball episodes, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Man way 00:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Grojband. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Fugget About It, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 20:31, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Looney Tunes Show, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Blurred Lines 23:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fugget About It. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 04:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Diff: [1] You have been around long enough to know that future airdates must be supported by reliable sources, not speculation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above warnings, you have been blocked for one week. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SpongeBob SquarePants (season 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Diffs: 2 edits Unexplained removal of Director fields. The fact that the content was removed to encourage the correct content to be added, is insufficient reason to remove the entire field. 3 edits Here, you removed a valid source, and also remove a short list of directors with no explanation. Given your history of disruptive edits, it is difficult to assume good faith. If you disrupt an article again, you will be referred for administrative intervention. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:09, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TV overview

These edits [2][3] are not consistent with WP:TVOVERVIEW. On large monitors, these 75% and 70% formats take up 14 inches of screen space to deliver five columns of information. It's an inefficient use of space. Since you have never participated in a discussion in talk space, I don't expect you to reply, but I do expect you to adhere to the Manual of Style. Otherwise, these changes will be considered vandalism, since discussion is a key aspect of the BRD process and is how we achieve consensus. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:47, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TVUPCOMING

Please familiarize yourself with WP:TVUPCOMING. The changes you made here contravene WP:TVUPCOMING, which states that we don't create new sections in a List of Episodes article until such a time as an episode table can be created. This was explained in edit summaries by both Dcbanners and myself. Additionally, you have again changed the series overview table width without explanation, and again in contravention of WP:TVOVERVIEW. It seems you are beginning to deliberately stray from established guidelines, which is problematic. If you continue to do so, and continue to refuse to participate in discussion to arrive at consensus, I will have no choice but to bring you to ANI. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Your addition to List of Clarence episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Clarence episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 00:26, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Clarence (2014 TV series) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: 2 edits I'm not sure how you missed the super-obvious embedded notes, but you are misusing the |first_run= parameter, and the first time the episode aired was in February 2014. Please familiarize yourself with Template:Infobox television. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:36, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Comedians (2015 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FX. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bounty Hamster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:PartnersFX.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PartnersFX.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 00:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to copyright violations

Hi, please do not link to potential copyright violations as you did here at Be Cool, Scooby-Doo!. The community takes this stuff seriously. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]