User talk:Mr. Faiyaz Khalid

October 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mr. Faiyaz Khalid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have contributed lots of articles in various language which i have not listed in my main page but i think the users who have got administrative previlage, are just harassing the new user. They do not even have work at wikipedia other than just humiliating the users. I appreciate most of the users are doing great work in this field but a few are just misusing there power. The allegations are imposed on me that i have created multiple account but no one knows why, so the reason of creating account is to contribute articles not for self enjoyment. No one has free time like other users who just poke on other users just because of having special previlage of blocking and deleting. I have contributed articles and will be contributing lots of articles in future so i am requesting the blocker to unblock me Mr. Faiyaz Khalid (talk) 19:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser says confirmed and technically indistinguishable. Such CU results will be nigh-impossible to contest. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rahat Public Junior High School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahat Public Junior High School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahat Public Junior High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]