Jump to content

User talk:Mr. Doggy Dog

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 02:26, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Doggy Dog, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Mr. Doggy Dog! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


March 2021

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Great Mouse Detective, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 22:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Kamp Koral: SpongeBob's Under Years has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Magitroopa (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 03:54, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Trolls

[edit]

With all due respect, please stop bloating film plots as you did on the "Trolls" movie page. Bloating plots is when you add information that is unnecessary to the basic plot points of the story and makes the article cumbersome to read by lengthening the sentences uncomfortably. Also, most of your edits to the article contained grammatical errors and/or redundancies as well. A redundancy is when the same thing is stated multiple ways just to make a point. For instance, saying that Creek sold out and betrayed them to be captured, then saying "Proving he isn't what he says he is and that it was a trap", is pointless because we've already stated that they were captured and that he betrayed them in the previous sentence, just a different way. Same with "reciprocates his feelings" and "she discovers she also loves him" both mean EXACTLY the same thing so we only need one. With plot summaries, the shorter and clearer and more precise you can say something, the better. Please consult the manual of style WP:FILMPLOT and basic editing rules in general. Thanks!

EEBuchanan (talk) 03:58, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Zootopia, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Seahawks4LifeTALK—CONTRIBS 18:15, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Inside Out (2015 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. See also: WP:FILMLEAD and WP:WEIGHT Chompy Ace 00:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop bloating plots, edit warring, and adding unsourced/inaccurate/unnecessary info to articles. Many people have tried to help you and brought this up; nearly all your recent edits fall into those categories and many have grammar issues too. Please read the WP:EDITWAR and other parts of the manual of style carefully, before making any more edits. You clearly want to help, and are doing this in good faith, but if you keep ignoring guidelines, edit warring, and failing to heed helpful advice, you are likely setting yourself up for a block someday and no one wants that, hence trying to help you. Please try to read the manual of style soon. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 02:32, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yet again, User:Mr. Doggy Dog, you are being advised that A)redundancies do not belong in articles, especially film plots. These need to be as concise as possible. For example, in "Trolls", you add "revealing himself to be a fraud" to a sentence already rather long and straggling and which already explains the character in question is a traitor, therefore stating the information twice in two different forms, which is completely unnecessary and bloats the plot. B) You should stop trying to start an edit war by constantly inserting the same information that is being deleted, not just in the Trolls article but other articles as well such as The Spongebob Squarepants Movie, with no explanation. If you are the only one who agrees something belongs in an article and want other people to agree with you, you need to discuss things on the talk page, or give a reason for your edit in the edit summary so people understand, not just constantly re-add the information. You should also read the edit summaries in the history of articles to see why your edits are being reverted, before going on. Please respond. Your talk page has many advice posts and warnings and you are ignoring them. This is not going to help you learn to be a good contributor to Wikipedia. Please let us help you - please respond. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 03:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that.

Mr. Doggy Dog, Your repeated edits/reverts to Trolls, while they may have been in good faith, are becoming very difficult to distinguish from willful disruption. To help other editors understand the reason for these changes, please start using edit summaries for your contributions or explain on the talk page why you want to keep adding the information. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please respond. I will not revert the plot if there is a good reason given but I did go ahead and tidy up the cast list. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 15:19, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


User:Mr. Doggy Dog I waited several days and heard nothing from you/no explanation or reasonable argument for the repeated insertion of the redundant information, so once again I have deleted it since you never responded with any convincing argument as to why it should be there. If you wish to discuss this I am open to discussion before either of us makes any more edits here, but please do not simply re-insert the information without discussing first. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 12:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for responding to my talk page! Posting this response here as well as there. I was a newer user myself once, and am still learning and have made mistakes. I was simply trying to explain to you something that had to once be explained to me, before someone reports and blocks you (I have refrained from doing so because I think that is a bad way to settle things with someone who isn't a vandal). IMPORTANT INFO YOU SHOULD KNOW:

  • On sites like a fandom wiki, or an IMDB website, you want to put every last detail in plot summaries. However, Wikipedia is not a fansite but an Encyclopedia, for informational purposes. Plot summaries here also are for encyclopedic purposes, and therefore the rules are different. You have to keep it under 700 words and be VERY selective and only put the most basic/"High points of the story" information, omitting any side details (See WP:FILMPLOT).
  • When I use the word "redundant", that's a grammar term that means you can only say something once, implications included. For instance, in any dictionary, the definitions of "despair" and "heartbreak" and "Destroyed happiness" are so similar, you don't need to use more than one of these terms in the article to explain the same event.
  • We don't add implications that we drew on our own (see WP:ORIGINAL RESEARCH). You say it's implied that his captivity in the jewel was a trap - that is your opinion/what you got from it, but some could argue that it couldn't possibly be a deliberate trap if Chef didn't know the other trolls were in Bridget's hair, or that Bridget was Lady Glittersparkles, and Creek didn't see Poppy until afterwards. Others could edit that that was a film editing error. Therefore, this isn't a point that can be considered "Encyclopedic fact".
  • There is a WP:MANUAL OF STYLE for article rules, and then we use basic "good english"/"good grammar" rules here so things look professional. For instance, keeping everything the same verb tense. What's more, the article looks unprofessional if we add lots of extra details about only one character in their character description, when other characters just have a brief precis of information.
  • Edit warring is also a no-no here, which means if you add info and it is removed, you repeatedly re-add it instead of discussing it with other users first to see if there could be a compromise reached (see WP:EDIT WAR).
  • We sign all talk page posts by putting four tildes, (four of these guys ~ ) which will automatically turn into a signature when saved.

I understand this must be important to you or a favorite part of the film. If you want to go to IMDB and edit the plot summary there, or the fandom wiki for Trolls or some other fansite, that would be the place to add what you are trying to add, though I'd try to correct the grammar a little even then. I hope this helps so you can make good article contributions in the future! :-) EEBuchanan (talk) 19:46, 30 May 2021 (UTC) (Putting this on my talk page as well)[reply]

June 2021

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at The Jungle Book 2, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Trolls (film), you may be blocked from editing. You have already been warned about this behavior on the article, and you need to stop. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:41, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Even if your edits are in good faith, once you start insistently putting the same reverted info into an article with no discussion or explanation it becomes disruptive. I have tried to be patient but you really need to stop. You have had it explained to you many times what "disruptive editing" is and that if you are the only person who wants to add info to an article, or if someone points out you are going against Wikipedia policies/the WP:Manual of Style, you need to accept the majority decision and/or correction. Furthermore you have had it explained in GREAT detail what redundant/unnecessary means in regards to the edits you have kept trying to put on the Trolls (film) article since April. I still am not reporting you yet, but given the times you have been warned about this and other issues on your talk page and completely ignored them, someone else very well may report you, and you will be blocked from editing. You do not want that and I do not want that. Please start listening to what other experienced editors are telling you so you can be a useful editor here. This sort of issue is happening on many articles you edit. You add info that you insist upon being there and refuse to accept other user's explanations of how it goes against policy and what constructive edits are. If you do not want your edits reverted you need to make sure they conform to Wikipedia policies. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 06:10, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oggy and the Cockroaches: Next Generation moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Oggy and the Cockroaches: Next Generation, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 19:54, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Grimm Conclusion moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, The Grimm Conclusion, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In a Glass Grimmly moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, In a Glass Grimmly, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Tale Dark and Grimm (book) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, A Tale Dark and Grimm (book), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oggy and the Cockroaches: Next Generation

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mr. Doggy Dog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oggy and the Cockroaches: Next Generation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oggy and the Cockroaches: Next Generation

[edit]

Hello, Mr. Doggy Dog. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oggy and the Cockroaches: Next Generation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monsters, Inc.. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been warned before about adding excessive detail to film plots, please don't do it. Captainllama (talk) 13:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bolt (2008 film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You have been warned before about adding excessive detail to film plots! If other editors say it is inaccurate, redundant, and/or unnecessary, please do not just keep reverting things back to the way you way you want them without checking the claims or discussing it on the article's talk page. Please check manual of style, wordcounter, and other tools before editing any more articles so you don't get blocked. Thanks! EEBuchanan (talk) 04:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon PLEASE STOP ADDING EXCESSIVE DETAIL TO FILM PLOT SUMMARIES as you did with The Incredibles. Summaries are to tell the ACTION of the plot, not describe the visual appearance of characters or their costumes, and besides there is a picture of the Parr family all in their supersuits right above the summary in this particular article so there was no need to add the detailed, minute description of the supersuit to the plot summary. PLEASE read WP:FILMPLOT, and then only make edits that fit within the guidelines. You have been told about not adding excessive info, multiple times now, by many different users. And have gotten into edit wars on the subject many times, too. It needs to stop. EEBuchanan (talk) 02:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Regarding how to help you understand what is and isn't constructive edit-wise. Not really wanting to get you blocked, but clearly my and other people's explanations aren't helping, as evidenced by recent edits on Looney Tunes: Back in Action, The Smurfs (2021 TV series), Have You Seen This Snail?, The Spongebob Movie: Sponge on the Run and Cars (film). Maybe Admin can help you with it. EEBuchanan (talk) 05:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Grimm Conclusion

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mr. Doggy Dog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Grimm Conclusion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:In a Glass Grimmly

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mr. Doggy Dog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In a Glass Grimmly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:A Tale Dark and Grimm (book)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mr. Doggy Dog. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:A Tale Dark and Grimm (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Bad Guys (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 06:13, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Cuphead Show Recurring Characters

[edit]

I understand you deleted some of the characters, because they were one-shot characters. Baby Bottle and Cala Maria were not one-shot. They appeared in two episodes. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:4519:3B3D:DC76:B739 (talk) 23:42, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Sorry about that. Mr. Doggy Dog (talk) 23:50, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at The Bad Guys (film), you may be blocked from editing. Tube·of·Light 05:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit at The Tale of Jemima Puddle-Duck

[edit]

Hi @Mr. Doggy Dog, you edit to The Tale of Jemima Puddle-Duck has been reverted as you did not add an explanation for the re-addition of the content. Nobody (talk) 06:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aladdin (1992 Disney film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Minion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mr._Doggy_Dog&oldid=1187227277"