User talk:Mr. Bobie

February 2021

Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. An edit that you recently made to Charles XI of Sweden seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Height discrimination have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Height discrimination was changed by Mr. Bobie (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860032 on 2021-12-19T23:31:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:32, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Your recent editing history at Pig War (1859) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sounder Bruce 01:17, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pig War (1859). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see MOS:SECTIONHEADING, which states Section headings should generally follow the guidance for article titles, and should be presented in sentence case (Funding of UNESCO projects in developing countries), not title case (Funding of UNESCO Projects in Developing Countries) Peaceray (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pig War (1859). Peaceray (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update to template transcluded on your userpage

I wish to inform you that as a result of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User hate CCP, one of the userboxes on your user page has been modified. If you are content with this change, you may leave it as-is. If you dislike this change, you may remove the userbox, reword it, or replace it with something else, as long as you do not restore the word "hate" or another word that is likely to be similarly offensive. If you have any questions, you may ask me on my talk page. Best wishes, —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 19:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]