User talk:Mr. Bergerac

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 20:15, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|This is clearly an abusive block. I have only reverted plain vandalism by an unconstructive user who started a revert war without any discussion or cause. The article Bernhard Weiß needs to be a disambiguation page because the obscure musician promoted by User:Katieh5584 is not the most famous Bernhard Weiß (Bernhard Weiß (police executive) is). I request that User:Katieh5584 is blocked. Mr. Bergerac (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)}}[reply]

Removing content regardless is vandalism, and you need to gain CONSENSUS from other wikipedia editors before you or anyone removes material from a page. Also blaming other people in an unblock request won't get you unblocked, please read WP:NOTTHEM. Momo san ^Gespräch 20:27, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect there was a misunderstanding - I'll unblock if you agree to solve the problem on the talk page instead of reverting. PhilKnight (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok Mr. Bergerac (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've unblocked your account. Have a look at the comment on Katieh5584's talk page - I think this was just a misunderstanding. PhilKnight (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think so too -- but Mr. Bergerac really needs to respond to, or at least acknowledge, warning messages rather than simply deleting them as "vandalism" and "trolling". --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]