User talk:Mr.Hanes

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Mr.Hanes. Thank you for your work on Majapahit conquest of Pasai. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia! May you and your family have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:04, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hussain Nizam Shah III has been accepted

Hussain Nizam Shah III, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Baqi:) (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

Did you have any issues with my proposal? Remove the indianized part as Garudam suggested, than if you want, your free to add the Indian Muslims part on your volition. Only thing is you should also include text that refutes the indo Muslim interpretation as I’ve previously mentioned because satish Chandra disagrees with this statement and he’s the most authoritative source here. So not adding his opinion would be undue.

Does this satisfy you or no? Because I’m going to probably make the change soon. But I would rather get some confirmation from you before I do. Someguywhosbored (talk) 13:22, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to go with Garudam's proposal and slightly including Chandra's view but I'd rather wait for others' views, let them vote or content first before we make any changes, also can you do something for these bulky replies [1]? I wouldn't mind if your move those with my reply above the Proposal subsection, just to make it neat and reader friendly. Just a suggestion. Mr.Hanes

Talk 13:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure what you mean by “vote”. Im pretty sure everybody has agreed with removing the indianized part. Flemmish and noorullah both agreed with my proposals already. Garudam is no longer going to be discussing this but even he agreed on the point that the “indianized” part should be removed. That just leaves you. So do we at least agree on the point that the “indianized” section should be removed? If you agree with Garudams proposal, than you also should agree with the removal of the title “indianized”.

So everybody already agrees. Honestly I can make the change now given we have consensus, but I just want you to understand this before I do so in good faith. Like I said, it’s not a problem of “agreeing” anymore. Everybody already believes that the indianized part should be removed, including Garudam per his proposal.

It seems like your mostly in agreement but I just want some confirmation before I make the change. Someguywhosbored (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also when I have time I’ll try to make my comments neater for readers in the future. Thanks for pointing that out. Someguywhosbored (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, I would like to make the change soon, so please let me know if you understand that consensus has already been reached. You can take time but If I don’t get a response, I’ll just assume this debate is over considering everybody agrees with the removal of the supposed “indianization” of the Delhi sultanate, including Garudam. You agreed with his proposal so it seems that this is set in stone now. Someguywhosbored (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]