Jump to content

User talk:Mr.Clown/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

An RFC on content you have commented on has opened, comments are welcome. MBisanz talk 01:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your vigilance in reverting the vandalism on my user page, it is much appreciated! --Storkk (talk) 17:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

I second that. Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page as well. →Wordbuilder (talk) 13:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Chinese cash

You have previously participated in discussions of the title of the article Chinese wén. If you care, please discuss a resolution of this issue by suggesting your preferred title at Talk:Chinese wén. — AjaxSmack 01:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

No Problem! °≈§→ Robomaeyhem ←§≈° 03:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


talk page

Hi Mr. Clown, was just curious about making edits to your own talk pages. I read in the guidlines that warnings and other such things can be removed once they have been read. I would appreciate it if you could clarify the rules on this for me please. Thanks 211.28.135.216 (talk) 11:19, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

This user is curious, because I have been restoring his\her warnings. I have done this because the user has been removing warning from socks and suspected sock accounts. I believe this information to be important for other users to be aware of. Let me know if you have any questions for me (either of you), as I would be more then happy to provide feed back. Thank you for your time, MatthewYeager 11:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I am not entirely certain of the policies myself, but I agree with Matthew's reasoning that the warnings are current and relevant, besides, since I don't think you are the blocked user, how do you know the user had read it? Mr.Clown (talk) 11:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello

You seem to be making unconstructive reverts to my constructive changes, please refrain from doing this. Thankyou in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielclancy (talkcontribs) 12:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Please read my reply in your talk page. Mr.Clown (talk) 12:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
ps. As rediculous as it sounds, adding three perfectly good sections and alumni does not constitute vandalism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vandalism may help you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielclancy (talkcontribs) 13:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Archive 1