User talk:Mpmusicwiki

Welcome

Hello, Mpmusicwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Liz Read! Talk! 00:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Mpmusicwiki, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 00:54, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Mandi Perkins

Hello, Mpmusicwiki. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Chubbles (talk) 15:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Mandi Perkins

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chubbles (talk) 02:52, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

User:Chubbles If you continue your threats on here in this manner I will move to a more formal complaint of your actions. This intimidation is unacceptable. Since this is in regards to Biographies of living person, this is an exception to the three revert rule, which was not violated in any event. As I am sure you are very much aware, verifiability is a requirement for your actions, which means "that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source." The source you are referencing does not exist on the site. The edits made are in accordance with what is factually stated on All Music so what exactly are you taking issue with? Why are you intent on moving forward with your changes and why are you not amenable to being factually correct?Mpmusicwiki (talk) 05:44, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Block

I have blocked this account because it looks like a corporate account even if it just a single person account. I have left your sock Arider88 (talk · contribs) unblocked but I shall block that as well if you do not add to its user page a clear declaration of your CoI in respect of Mandi Perkins. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)