User talk:Mpearmain

January 2014

Hello, I'm Lesion. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Occipital neuralgia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Lesion (talk) 11:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to London has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: London was changed by Mpearmain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906506 on 2014-01-31T02:59:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at China. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators can block users from editing if they repeatedly vandalize. The reverted edit can be found here. The Determinator p t c 03:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poop deck, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Poop deck was changed by Mpearmain (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965913 on 2014-01-31T03:11:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jin campaigns against the Song Dynasty. Cogito-Ergo-Sum (14) (talk) 03:28, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Dark N Misterious 03:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do that was so wrong????? Dark N Misterious 03:37, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Mason

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mpearmain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I feel that while some of my edits were vandalism, I didn't deserve this, because I was correcting someone's awful typo on this edit to Jin campaigns against the Song Dynasty. I'm sorry if fixing errors is vandalism. Dark N Misterious 22:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It wasn't a typo. If, even after being blocked, you didn't look up the difference between vassal and vessel it's a good reason to keep you this way. Max Semenik (talk) 00:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.