User talk:Moviefreak11

Welcome!

Hello, Moviefreak11, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Civil engineering may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Graham87 02:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Moviefreak11 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am new to this wikipedia. So, I started with basic things such as correcting syntax error and cleaning inappropriate reference links and replacing with appropriate one, as I saw many of the irrelevant reference being linked up at inappropriate places even though such links were related to article as a whole. I have tried to make changes in minor grammatical errors as well. I have just begun in wikipedia so I started with minor changes.

Decline reason:

"Could be my own account"? Really? It either is, or it isn't .. not a could be. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm personally unable to find a reason why this is indefinite - although I can see a few major errors that led to a block of some duration. First, on two separate articles you replaced reliable sources (such as the Hindustan times) with non-reliable ones. You also appear to have messed up an infobox for Cartier Railway. These appear minor overall, but add up t a bit of WP:COMPETENCE issues. Care to expand so that I can get a better idea and/or contact the blocking admin for further clarification? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How about the account Moviefreak7 (talk · contribs), which made similar edits? And why do you think the sites you added are reliable sources to begin with? They seem like spam to me. Graham87 09:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, BWilkins & Graham. In reference to your above reply: Yes, Moviefreak7 (talk · contribs) could be my own account but it might have happened that I forgot the username or password for that. So, I created a new one movie freak 11. And I have not messed up with infobox for cartier railway. If you check the older version, the infobox was little messed up not showing properly the start and end date. So, I corrected it. Regarding replacing of articles of Hindustan Times, like I said above, the article might be relevant to the movie as whole, but the location of reference was not appropriate so I placed a appropriate reference for that location in the article. It was for Director or Producer of the movie. The reference should be precise allowing users to find what they want, not a ton of information to search into.}}

Duplicate request disabled Mdann52 (talk) 12:40, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So basically, what you are saying is that Moviefreak7 (talk · contribs · count) is another of your accounts? In that case, we have a case of sockpuppetry then? Mdann52 (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]