User talk:MovieDYSP

Hello, MovieDYSP. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 99.149.85.229 (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

tags fixed

hi the tags are fixed on the article how do I get rid of the cleanup tags from the article there are threeMovieDYSP (talk) 00:59, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MovieDYSP, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi MovieDYSP! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.

What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.

If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:

Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page.
Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 18:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MovieDYSP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the edits made under this user name are Neutral please unblock i'm new to wiki and have made mistakes editing that is why there are so many edits I'm just trying to figure it out!

Decline reason:

At a minimum, you will need to change the username, as noted above. Please use the other template and propose a username that is not promotional. Kuru (talk) 00:47, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MovieDYSP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

NorikTomik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

unblock edits neutral added new user name thank you uuu 11:16 pm, 24 May 2013, Friday (16 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Your username choice is acceptable, but from your replies I do not get the impression that you understand why you were blocked. Danger ^{High voltage!} 08:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business or movie directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 11:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the user name because I was told this "At a minimum, you will need to change the username, as noted above. Please use the other template and propose a username that is not promotional. Kuru" (−) (±)I picked the user name because I'm new to wiki and it fit the page I created I understand the 3 important principles and have not violated them. My edits are neutral and my user name does not represent a company and the article I created is notable.uuu 16:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

YES I understand why I was Blocked and I understand the 3 important principles and have not violated them. uuu 13:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MovieDYSP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the edits are unrelated so please unblock there is no reason to block my edits when they are unrelated to the content and neutral and can the editor who deleted the edits made on the RT rating double check the facts because the he took out the correct RT rating of the film with incorrect information

Decline reason:

Not only is your unblock request both confusing and unconvincing, it also fails to address your inappropriate use of multiple accounts. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 19:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

the RT rating as of June 2013 is 61% why did the editor change the correct rating? why is the editor re blocking?

Note to reviewing admins: Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MovieDYSP. —DoRD (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've explained before I'm new to wiki and it took me time to figure it out---it's simple there is no other reason than learning how to use wikipedea that's it simple uuu 21:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC)