User talk:Mouse001

User Page

Greetings, If you add some characters to your User Page, your alias will turn from red to blue.CFredkin (talk) 16:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note an attempt to bar me,Nocturnalnow, from ALL U.S. political articles is underway

NorthBySouthBaranof (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is at it again; this time there is a much more aggressive posture aimed at entirely shutting down my edits. Please note the "Result" suggestion at the bottom of the discussion.Your comment regarding this banning attempt would be greatly appreciated. Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nocturnalnow Ban Attempt Nocturnalnow (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commented :) Good luck.--Mouse001 (talk) 03:21, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources, etc.

Re this edit on Ron Paul - There were three major problems with your additions, hence my revert:

This post on a Wordpress opinion blog, to which you linked, is not a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources.
The new header you added ("Facing Election Fraud at State Conventions") and accompanying text ("There are numerous documented cases of election fraud that occurred at the state conventions during Paul's 2012 presidential run") are not supported by the cited sources and lend a distinctly POV color to the article. The Reuters opinion piece you cite is an opinion piece, not straight news, and more importantly it never uses the word "fraud" (that's a strong word and one that we must be extremely careful about using). The third source you cite - the Democracy Now transcript - also never uses the word fraud.

So that's why I reverted your edits. Neutrality^talk 06:30, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

Hello, I was limited by the template to including 7 Users but you can still make a comment at this venue https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_American_politics_2 Nocturnalnow (talk) 20:51, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of discretionary sanctions

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

HighInBC 01:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You are very clearly not here to help build a neutral encyclopaedia, but instead to promote an ideology. Your edits strongly suggest that this is not your first or only account. Thank you, but I think we can do without you. Guy (Help!) 13:09, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe so.

I'm not surprised by this block, it seems that Wikipedia has some sort of bias in favor of particular people/viewpoints being written about. It is certainly very inappropriate for an admin to assume that this is not my "first or only account" without any evidence whatsoever.--Mouse001 (talk) 14:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]