User talk:Mottengott

Welcome

Hello, Mottengott! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

List of comics publishing companies

I don't understand the reference you added [1] to List of comics publishing companies. It said: <ref>Apprise Media L.L.C.</ref>

Is the reference a book? A magazine article? A newspaper article? Something else? I'd be glad to help you learn how to format references but a company name by itself can't be a reference. So just let me know what your source is and we'll figure out how to fix it together. Cloveapple (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, should've been this link. I just fixed the ref [[2]].
Thanks for your help, --Mottengott (talk) 03:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mottengott. You have new messages at NatGertler's talk page.
Message added 18:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nat Gertler (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited List of comics publishing companies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Frank Miller and John Byrne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slight correction

I doubt you'll be using this info on your German page for About Comics, but I made a small error in fact when I said that Schulz's Youth was released for the Kindle in February 2008. It was actually released at some point in 2007. --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the Pulse of Morning

Mottengott, I removed your inclusion of the poem in On the Pulse of Morning because it isn't necessary. If users want to read the poem, they can visit the offsite link provided in "External links". It also makes the article over-long. Please see this for the policy in question: [3]. Thanks. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 05:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your revert

Hello, Mottengott. You have new messages at Jack Sebastian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Moles (Australian band)

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Moles (Australian band), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://kootenays.myezrock.com/Music/Artist.aspx?id=200438.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 21:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Gott 21:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Moles (Australian band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Diego Comic-Con International, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greg Evans (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:45, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of comics publishing companies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{ComPub|name= [[After Hours Press]] |country= US<ref>[http://www.afterhourspress.net/ Homepage of After Hours Press <sub>Retrieved 19.June 2013</sub></
1991| defunct=1996<ref>http://www.comicguide.de/php/suche_v.php?search=Totenkopf+Verlag</ref>| note)}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of comics publishing companies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people with surname Miller may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hiram may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:46, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Algernon (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Algernon Seymour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of people with surname Miller (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Müller

New Safari Hotel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Robert Taylor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1967 establishments in Tanganyika

Category:1967 establishments in Tanganyika, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Tim! (talk) 07:32, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rough Cut Comics

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rough Cut Comics, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.roughcut-comics.com/pages/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cologne Cathedral

Look harder for what has been described. The brick section is quite large, and is distinguished by the lack of carved Gothic details. Amandajm (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right, my bad. Sorry, --Gott (talk) 14:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leonard Gardner may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

7202-fat-city-and-fat-city-an-appreciation|title= Fat City and Fat City: an appreciation|author= [[George Edward Kimball|Kimball, George|date= 16. September 2009|work= |publisher= The Sweet Science|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to White Train (disambiguation) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{db|wrong lemma, sry (correct: White Arrow (disambiguation)}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wheelchair curling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Smirnov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zinn Beck

Hi there. I couldn't help but notice you've added "Zinn Beck" as a notable person in 7 different cities. In one city, Portsmouth, all that was entered was that he managed a baseball team there for a year, with no reference. I'm not sure these are helpful edits. Thanks. Richard Apple (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since the "Notable person" sections are for people either born or otherwise connected to a ciy; it doesn't matter what his connection to said city is, or if he is notable for 2 or 20 cities. About the references, i only add them to "Notable"-sections when the person is notable, but has no own article yet. Every Bluelink will have the ref in its own article, or else i'll add it there. Or am i wrong here? Thanks for feedback, regards, --Gott (talk) 12:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me, and sorry if I seemed sharp. Like you, I do this because I like to share interesting information with others, and one of my favourite topics is small American towns. When I edit some towns, I sometimes notice that the "notable people" section is filled with names of those who are either not really notable, or have a passing connection to the town. Sometimes these lists are enormous, and don't really add to the article. I suspect these names get added because editors are proud of those people and the huge impact they have had on the community. I'm not a veteran editor or a fanatical follower of rules, but I've found Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline to be a useful guide. It suggests that "notable" means born there, or lived there for a significant amount of time. I've also found that a great way around this is to write that person into the article. In the Portsmouth article, for example, there is a one-paragraph section about its sports teams. A line or two about Zinn Beck, with a reference, would be great. As for adding references, an administrator recently convinced me to add references to everything added to Wikipedia. I had previously just assumed that since the person or topic already had a Wiki article, then what was on that blue-link page was correct. In fact, it often isn't. Relying on other Wiki articles as a reference leads to WP:CIRCULAR, and would require a reader to go to another article for verifiability. Again, thanks for your edits, and sorry to have jumped on you. Richard Apple (talk) 14:32, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No harm done. I know exactly what you mean, having had the same thoughts myself. To shed some light on what i'm doing why - in my opinion, proper linking and categorizing is essential for a encyclopedia this size and still growing. I often come across said "Notable"-sections in articles filled with people that don't show up in the corresponding category (if existing), or vice versa. Thus i try to synchronize both. I check all people already there and distinguish them between "born" and "lived/worked/died" with bold text, add the persons already categorized, add cats the other way round and add born- and died-years. Wile i'm at it, i go through the other cats, and make minor adjustments, spelling corrections and the like, to the article while "passing by". Needless to say that i add proper refs to the main article, if missing.

Who to add is an entirely different question. Take New York City for example. There is a plethora of people, musicians, artists and so on, moving there. I'm not sure NYians would like to see every notable person taken off their list and just left those actually born there. Adding only people in some way important to a city would also raise another question: where to draw the line? How to decide which non-native is to add to notable sections, and who not? As i see it, every person born, grew up, moved to, worked at, lived or died in a given city, should be added to their notable people section. If getting too long, it can and should always be forked to it's own article. I see absolutly no problem with that as long as everything is ref'd properly and it is apparent who is a native, and who is not.

Thanks for the feedback, and again, no harm done. We both share the same goal, and your work on small towns is very appreciated. Regards, Gott (talk) 17:14, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you take requests?

Saw you had translated an article at the German-speaking notice board, do you still do that? Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not recently, but if i can be of any help, i'll be glad to. Gott (talk) 19:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If/when you have time, I would like Deutscher Pfadfinderbund (1911–1933) - could be extracted from de:Deutscher Pfadfinderbund (1911–1933), and thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean to make you quiet.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah damn, i totally forgot your request! I've had too much to do the last weeks ... I'll see to the article asap, it should be in order in one, or two days, tops. Regards, Gott (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:28, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As you probably noticed, i havn't been all that active the last few weeks because of some personal problems i had to take care of. I REALLY am sorry for promising something i don't keep in the end ... first thing today, i finally finished the article. Yes, i rushed to complete it, but i'll continue polishing it the next days. If wished, i'll also see to create Deutscher Pfadfinderbund (1945) to complete the topic. Again, i apologize for the delay, normally i'm more reliable. Thanks for your patience, regards, Gott (talk) 01:26, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, sorry, are you okay? Take your time, there is no rush. I've been sick all winter so I understand. Yes, please create Deutscher Pfadfinderbund (1945), but only when you have time.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i am now, thanks for asking. You could see by the fact that it took so long, and i even totally forgot about it, that something was going on. I hope you overcame your sickness completly? I'll see to Deutscher Pfadfinderbund (1945) as per de.wiki shortly. Question: Would it make sense, to combine both articles into one (thats why i left the years out of the title for the moment)? Regards, Gott (talk) 02:48, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. I should ask our resident expert on Germanic Scouting to answer best. Hang on.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mottengott:They are separate. I've started a stub.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PIL listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect PIL. Since you had some involvement with the PIL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 15:14, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for getting the answer to my question about Nova Express. Felicity4711 (talk) 04:23, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ebon degree

Disambiguation pages are for disambiguating topics in the Wikipedia, not every conceivable topic. See WP:Disambiguation. But the problem is two-fold. I don't disagree that the Ebon degree exists, I've even seen the outside of a Demolay pamphelet about it, but pretty obviously it is either not very important or is part of the insider knowledge that is not shared, hence the lack of sources. The second problem is that even if it were important in the Demolay context, the IP editor here is not content with an ordinary dab entry, but keeps placing a promotional entry on the Ebon page. If you go back in the history, you'll see that I am not the only one to have removed it, nor the first. The IP editor has been inserting this or similar language on the dab page periodically since February 2012 and been consistently reverted by other editors such as Mean as custard and Eluchil404 (see edit), I did not address this issue until December 2013. I did initiate discussion at both Talk:DeMolay International and Talk:Ebon. --Bejnar (talk) 17:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see. As mentioned, i won't look into this, since i know nothing about that. Anyway, i'd still support mentioning Ebon in the dab page, even if not featured prominently in the article about demolay, but i'll leave it as is. I will still change the dab a bit, being that the reason i came across this "edit war" in the first place. Thanks for the answer, regards, Gott (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O'Neill comedies

No, that's a great edit. Nothing to dicker with there. Thanks. Monkeyzpop (talk) 02:42, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hiram (name) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Hiram Bingham, Hiram Berry, Hiram Evans, Hiram Stevens, Hiram Tuttle and Hiram Wilkinson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Girl Scouts of the USA members

Category:Girl Scouts of the USA members, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 21:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph DeLuca

Attempts have been made to eliminate the page you created for Joseph DeLuca by simply redirecting it (without contents) to the United Flight 93 page. As DeLuca was arguably notable before his death, I thought you might like to keep an eye on that page as well in order to help protect its contents. Taram (talk) 18:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph DeLuca (racing driver) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph DeLuca (racing driver) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph DeLuca (racing driver) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 14:02, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hiram Messenger (disambiguation)

The article Hiram Messenger (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:TWODABS, hatnotes more direct

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INTDABLINK

When adding links intentionally pointing to disambiguation pages, please be aware of WP:INTDABLINK. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Adomian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Madonna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mottengott. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at James Grimes (soccer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:52, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello, I noticed you removed a 'prod ' from Zhang Jingzhe but did not add any actual refs. Although you added an external link, 'Transfermarkt' is not considered a reliable source by the Wiki football project. Also, the player does not pass WP:NFOOTY as he has not made an appearance in a fully professional league. It is debatable in these circumstances whether the prod can or should be restored, but the page may well be deleted via 'XFD' in the long run. Regards, Eagleash (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was under the impression, the external link provided was enough to at least prove what the article states.

But, I hadn't checked WP:NFOOTY. If the second Chinese league doesn't meet the notability criteria, please feel free to re-insert the prod tag.

Thanks for the message, regards, --Gott (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One of my 'colleagues at NFOOTY has added a reliable link (Soccerway). (That and Soccerbase are both considered OK). However he has also restored the 'prod'. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mottengott. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember...

Focus on the content rather than contributors. Oh, and please leave an edit summary. Thanks. Cassianto^Talk 14:28, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- SchroCat (talk) 14:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]