User talk:Mossdaniels

Re: Conflict of Interest

Hey, thanks for your response.

Just to be clear, I wasn't saying that the article was biased at all, but we try to avoid people writing about something they are related to. I've just left a box on the talk page telling users that you have a connection to the club, so they'll keep a lookout (it's nothing to worry about). Since your article is written in an unbiased way, I haven't tagged it for violating the Conflict of Interest rules. You can continue editing as normal, but be sure not to write anything biased into the article, or the edits may be rolled back.

Also, just a quick tip, when you're signing your name at the end of a message, instead of typing your name, put ~~~~ (your signature) at the end. It automatically prints out information about your account (such as your talk page and a link to your contributions) and what time the message was posted. Leaving your signature is required.

Thanks, Dathus • Talk Contribs 16:02, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Picture

Hey! Thanks for taking an interest in adding an article!

It looks like you've already succeeded in adding an image to the article (Lisgoold GAA), but the box on the top means that you're only referring to primary sources as your citations, and that you should add some secondary and tertiary sources to make the article more credible (you can read more about that here). You can't remove this box unless you've added some other sources. If you have, remove the line that says {{primary sources|date=October 2015}} at the top of the page.

There's a problem, though. On Wikipedia, we try to keep our articles as objective as possible, and when somebody writes an article about themselves or their company, it causes a Conflict of Interest. For example, an article about a band shouldn't be written by the band's manager; it would be biased, even if not intended to be. In the same way, an article about a GAA Club shouldn't be written by their PRO. It would be great if you could get back to me on what you wanted to get out of the page.

Thanks, Dathus • Talk Contribs 15:44, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mossdaniels, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mossdaniels! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ciarán Cronin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cork. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. And thanks for helping expand it in areas in which you have an interest. I hope my recent edits/summaries (in relation to capitalisation) are clear. If you need any further assistance, please do drop me a note or check-out the relevant WP:MOS guidelines. From here, and with apologies if this seems like frustrating interference, I would encourage you to read the WP:WWIN section. In particular the guidelines about Wikipedia not being an alternative to web hosting. I suggest this because I notice that you have created placeholders for what look like being "match reports" for notable matches from a sports club with which you may have an association. Normally this type of thing would be hosted on a club website or similar. It isn't normally a level of detail one would expect to find in a Wikipedia article. I would please ask that these guidelines in particular be considered when expanding the article. Thanks and happy editing. Guliolopez (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Lisgoold Junior Hurling Squad 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lisgoold Junior Hurling Squad 2008.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2009 U21 East Cork Hurling Final.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:2009 U21 East Cork Hurling Final.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2009 Under 21 Hurling Final.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:2009 Under 21 Hurling Final.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your photo uploads

The photos you uploaded have already appeared elsewhere online. We can't take your word for it that you are the copyright holder and have the right to upload them here. What you will need to do is follow the instructions given at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials#Granting us permission to copy material already online. This will start the process of getting an OTRS ticket in place on the items proving that Wikipedia has permission to use them. I know this sounds complex, but hopefully if you take it step by step it will go ok. Please let me know if there are any questions. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lisgoold Hurling Team 1971.jpg

Are you the photographer? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That photo is in my home. Mossdaniels (talk) Moss 13:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which didn't answer the question. Did you take the ORIGINAL photo (as opposed to taking a photo of the photo?) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No it was a present given to us as we had a relation on the team, the photo was scanned and framed. Mossdaniels (talk) Moss 16:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lisgoold Hurling Team 1971.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lisgoold Hurling Team 1971.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mossdaniels. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]