User talk:Mosesconfuser

Welcome!

Hello, Mosesconfuser, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

WP:3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of Korea. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Appletrees (talk) 02:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You ignore my warning twice and an opportunity to discuss the matter at the TAlk. Not only you are doing gaming the rule, but also violated 6RR in total, so you have to face a consequence. Regards --Appletrees (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR

I report your 4 to 6RR violation.--Appletrees (talk) 04:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to History of Korea has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Captain panda 03:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to History of Korea, you will be blocked from editing. ukexpat (talk) 03:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

3RR violation on History of Korea. EdJohnston (talk) 04:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mosesconfuser (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I know I violate the policy but it's unjustified if I am blocked by my violation itself. At least, the administrators should take a look what I changed before accusing me waging 'editing war'. This article are full of fabricated "evidence" and imaginations. Even the legend they used are altered. Like someone commented in the discussion 'It reads as if a bunch of uber-patriotic 15-year-old wankers wrote a fairy-tale history piece for "We Worship Our Country" day.' I don't feel comfortable to that way to describe history. All I want to do is to defend the reputation of Wiki. As a new user to wiki, I admit I don't fully understand the rules here. I wrote emails to admins. But my opinion was neglected. I feel a very disappointment because this website is not as serious as I thought. If people get punished without any judgment, who the hell need some administrator? I bet computer program can do better. [Mosesconfuser 05:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)]

Decline reason:

The 24 hour block is reasonable and brief. — Athaenara ✉ 05:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.