User talk:Moscvitch

Welcome!

Hello, Moscvitch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Image

I'm sorry but I had to remove that image as it didn't indicate the licensing information. Where did it come from? --Guinnog 00:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Hoover Dam GTASA.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Hoover Dam GTASA.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 03:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalise pages or add biased comments like you did with Vladimir Putin. Shotlandiya 17:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Alexander Litvinenko (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:War on Terrorism

Hello, have you some arguments to put the Second Chechen War (with its major events) in this template ? The Moscow theater hostage crisis and Beslan school hostage crisis are obviously terrorists attacks but considering that it's the governement (Boris Berezovski with perhaps Putin) itslef who bombed his own citizens to declare the war to Chechen. It seems me a bit problematic. If you agree I'll put a link to the terrorist attacks of the tchtchen on the template ^_^ Mrpouetpouet 22:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

"Yes, of course, the operations of Shamil Basayev in Russia is a terrorism. Chechen fighters killed many Russian citizens - this is terrorim. But Russian government operation is not terrorism, but the fight against terrorists on the territory of our country. Federal forces In Chechnya destroyed many bandits as citizens of Russia as well as foreign mercenaries, such as Arabs (Ibn Al-Khattab), and members of Al-Qaeda." I perfectly agree with you, about Basayev. The problem is not here. For me the problem is: Is the Second Chechen War part of the war on terrorism (the campaign of the Us all around the world). And for me the answer is clearly no, because first it's a fact that trouble have been ocurrind in Caucasus since centuries (British against Russia, Chamil against Russia, Us against Russia, Armenian and Russia against Turkey, 3rd Reich against Russia etc....) This war is clearly part of this conflict.

And then because, and we must not forget that, the Second Chechen War broke off in 1999, when the bombs exploded in Moscow. Putin (supported by Berezovky => what a mistake haha well done Putin ^^) used this argument to be elected and to declare the war to the Chechen. BUT it's now clear that it's Berezovsky men who bombed innocent Russian citizen. ==> conclusion it's a conflict between Russia and Chechen part of the caucasus conflict and isn't part of the "us worldwide campaign".

However you are right: "Why have you removed from the list of "Major terrorist attacks and plots" the biggest terrorist attacks in Russia (2002 Kaspiysk bombing - 43 killed, 2003 Stavropol train bombing - 46 killed, 2003 Red Square bombing - 6 killed, Russian aircraft bombings of August 2004 - 89 killed)? At the same time, this list has "Glasgow Airport attack" - 1 killed. Do you think that the life and safety of British people valuable than the lives of the Russians?"

My idea was to put the link to Second Chechen War crimes and terrorism in the related articles on the template. Because the conflict is slightly related to al-quaida: "Federal forces In Chechnya destroyed many bandits as citizens of Russia as well as foreign mercenaries, such as Arabs (Ibn Al-Khattab), and members of Al-Qaeda.". I added under that main link, the two main (according to my mind) Chechen terrorist attack => Moscow theater hostage crisis and Beslan school hostage crisis. Obviously the reader have acess to the others 2002 Kaspiysk bombing - 43 killed, 2003 Stavropol train bombing - 46 killed, 2003 Red Square bombing - 6 killed, Russian aircraft bombings of August 2004 - 89 killed) on the Second Chechen War crimes and terrorism article :)

Do not hesitate to tell me if you think I'm wrong ;) Have a good night in Moscow (I lived during one year there ^^) Mrpouetpouet 17:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for an explanation of the position. Certainly, you are right, that the Second Chechen war is the part of the long conflict on Northern Caucasus which has begun in XIX century, first of all. Have a good night in Lausanne, too. Moscvitch 20:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mrpouetpouet has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Mrpouetpouet | Talk 23:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Efimov stalin1.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Efimov stalin1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Гиннес

Is this a failed redirect or what? I guess I just don't know what the intention was for this. --Woland (talk) 21:32, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I thought, that I work in Russian Wikipedia. You can delete that redirect. --Moscvitch (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:S allilueva 2005.JPG)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:S allilueva 2005.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hryhorii Skovoroda

Could you please look at this? It is incredible!--Antoni Chojnacki (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hryhorii Skovoroda Can I expect any support from your side? --Antoni Chojnacki (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:White trash.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:White trash.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]