User talk:Mortsey
Welcome!
Anyone visiting from the Bru People page, Sorry if my edits are incorrect. Please help me out where I have erred. I was attempting to create additional content to the page. Mortsey (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
- Please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions. --Kralizec! (talk) 03:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Hey Mortsey. Thanks for your kind words about my article. I know that my Fundamentalist-Modernist article is probably longer than it needs to be, but I also think that it's an issue that lots of people have strong opinions about without actually knowing a lot of the facts, (e.g. when people think "Christian fundamentalist", lots of people think rural hicks who don't know any better, as opposed to the reality that the initial "fundamentalists" were Ivy League professors, and if you go back and read The Fundamentals, I don't think that the fundamentalist movement can accurately be described as "anti-intellectual," which is another common stereotype people have about fundamentalists). So, I wanted to write an article that would let people have the facts so that they could judge for themselves.
If you want to know more about my background, my Wikipedia user page is pretty comprehensive. Maybe one of the reasons why I was well-placed to write a neutral article on the controvery is because I feel sympathy for both parties in the debate. I grew up in a very liberal church, but came to identify myself with the conservative wing of that church. I flirted with fundamentalism a bit in my later teenage years, currently worship in an evangelical denomination, but when push comes to shove, I would still identify myself as a conservative mainline Christian. So, from the article, the person I really identify with is Clarence E. Macartney, the man who resolutely opposed the spread of liberalism in the PCUSA, but nevertheless refused to leave the PCUSA when all the other conservatives left.
If you want to talk more about these issues, let me know.
Adam_sk 04:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on A Beka Academy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Esprit15d 21:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Mortsey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)