User talk:Morefun
Do you have a general reference for the equipment section? I've been searching all over for information on her equipment, and I've haven't found a lot. CloudNine 17:14, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Nope, it's good! I've changed the section title to "Instrumentation" and made it a subsection of "Musical style" (I plan to write that section soon), to be consistent with Pixies etc. I'll reference it once you've finished; I can sort out the {{cite web}}s. CloudNine 11:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm planning to write a Musical style section (with sections like Frank Black). Anyway, it's not a big deal :) Your choice! CloudNine 10:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Random Smile!
[edit]WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
-WarthogDemon 21:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Audio barnstar
[edit]The Audio Barnstar | ||
For your contributions on Dzeltenie Pastnieki and their albums. --SpeedKing (talk) 18:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC) |
Cheers
[edit]Thanks for that. MegX (talk) 09:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Kim and Kelley's photos
[edit]Can you tell me how you know which photo is of Kim, and which of Kelley? Because the photographer clearly labeled them as Kim Deal and Kelley Deal. If I can be sure, I think at least one of those photos should be used, (on the correct article however)! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Before switching photos...
[edit]Hey. First let me say, that since finally registering to edit the Wikipedia, for the past few years I've uploaded -and placed well over 300 photos through Wikimedia Commons to the en.wiki, pt.wiki, and sp.wiki. (A 'short' list is on my user page of those I've placed of musicians- being in the musicians' and biography work groups.) I've learned to listen to both my gut instinct and to the photographers themselves, particularly those who are pro-photographers. I emailed the photographer regarding the Kelley and Kim Deal photos. Here is his response:
- I can assure you that the photos are well appointed, Kim is this:[1] And Kelley is this: [2] Do not understand why anyone could think otherwise ... I was really surprised by your message... I take [took- translation from Spanish, sorry!] a look at the Wikipedia articles as they are (not my photos) and I think I've found the problem, the girl in this picture is not kim ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Deal ) is kelley!... Kim and Kelley Deal are twin sisters and are quite similar, but Kim is thinner than kelley .... I understand your need to be sure With the photos ... I photographed the Deal sisters in the summer of 2008 at a festival in Madrid, Summercase, exactly on 18 July in Boadilla del Monte (Madrid)... Tell me if this strange mystery clears Leah, my photos are at your disposal if you want ...
- So. It appears there's a problem here, because it's far easier for me to believe a photographer who was there with access to both women than another editor. If we were to change photos --and someone close to the Deal sisters or they themselves found the photos to be wrong it would be a terrible reflection on the Wikipedia. At this point I wonder if the existing photos should be removed as well. ARE YOU sure? I dislike running the edge of the WP "Original research" clause, but perhaps it would be worthwhile to contact their publicists.--Leahtwosaints (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Whatever. I just wanted to make sure, since this man spent time with the two. One last thing- and please take it to heart. When you revert anything so large as this, it is common courtesy to contact the other editor and explain the reason, whether they are experienced editors or new ones.--Leahtwosaints (talk) 22:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- So. It appears there's a problem here, because it's far easier for me to believe a photographer who was there with access to both women than another editor. If we were to change photos --and someone close to the Deal sisters or they themselves found the photos to be wrong it would be a terrible reflection on the Wikipedia. At this point I wonder if the existing photos should be removed as well. ARE YOU sure? I dislike running the edge of the WP "Original research" clause, but perhaps it would be worthwhile to contact their publicists.--Leahtwosaints (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
You're very welcome
[edit]Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
RE: Stone Rollin'
[edit]It's not in the track listing, while the previous mention of the hidden track in the article body does not note that it "follows silence at the end of 'The Answer'." I was prepping the article for Good article nomination, so something unsourced would not meet with GA criteria. Dan56 (talk) 21:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Latvian help needed
[edit]Hello Morefun, I'm contacting you because we need some Latvian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on lv.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Latvian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:21, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Morefun. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Morefun. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Morefun. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)