User talk:Morako

Please stop posting advertising redirects such as LiveVideoService. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 22:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of WWBN.com

An article that you have been involved in editing, WWBN.com, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWBN.com. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:34, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move for WWBN.com

I think. it's will be better if we moved it...i think when somebody want to search he will write WWBN without ".com" because it's the real name. i think like this. --O.waqfi (talk) 10:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK..I want to tell any admin here, is that ok? --O.waqfi (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid I am not going to move the article WWBN.com to WWBN, since the latter page already exists; in addition, the former one is currently nominated for deletion. Unless there's a very good reason not to keep it at its current title, it'll be better to wait until the deletion debate/vote concludes (and if the article is deleted, the issue will become moot). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page WWBN.com do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page, you said that the page WWBN.com "is intended to bring awarenes" to your system. I am afraid you have come to the wrong place, as Wikipedia is not a means of promoting your company or website. (It is meant to be an encyclopedia - that is, a compendium of existing knowledge, and not a vehicle used to make something known.)

Please see our notability guidelines for companies and web content; basically, notability is defined by third-party coverage, but your article cites none. I have also checked your organization's website at Alexa, and its rank is quite low (over 2.5 million) - this also doesn't suggest that it is notable.

If you disagree with the article being nominated for deletion, you can contribute its debate/vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWBN.com. Regards, Mike Rosoft (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Search Engine Journal is trivial coverage (as far as I can see, nothing but a mere mention that the company exists), and the book at Stargroup Division is NOT a third-party reference, being written by the company's boss. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 08:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]