User talk:Moovi/Archive 2

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	I love seeing a small edit that improves the readability, and, more importantly, the precision and connotation of a sentence. This edit of yours was a fine example of what I'm talking about. Good show! HuskyHuskie (talk) 19:50, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ty Moovi (talk) 00:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Fugitive

I know that we have disagreed in the past, but I just want to say that your recent edits are spot on. Cheers! ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 01:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was trying to comprehend the purpose of the changes. They don't provide anything helpful or insightful to the article. Although I would reconsider linking the FDA link since perhaps some international readers might not be familiar with that American agency. Moovi (talk) 04:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just done so –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 05:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is welcomed. Good work! Thanks. –
– Gareth Griffith-Jones |The Welsh Buzzard|— 10:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

US Marshals film

I changed plot, but it got changed again later by you. Why? I'm unable to understand some events. Was Sheridan really selling secrets to Chinese Man or Did Frank Barrows use a payphone to make Sheridan think it was just a Kite's Job to make Routine Exchange Suitcases with Chinese Man? If Sheridan didn't know that the suitcase had Government Secrets, then how come Sheridan didn't open the suitcase before-hand? Is it because Sheridan's not supposed to open Suitcases? When 1st agent's behind Sheridan in Garage, did Agent even Identify himself to Sheridan? How's that Self-Defense for Sheridan to kill 1st agent?(76.20.90.53 (talk) 05:23, 1 February 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

The plot points are clearly explained. There's no need for playback on every small topic, or scene by scene dialogue as you inserted. See WP:FILMPLOT. It clearly states: The plot summary is an overview of the film's main events, so avoid minutiae like dialogue, scene-by-scene breakdowns, individual jokes, and technical detail. Moovi (talk) 03:23, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For god-sake, please just answer my questions. You're driving me insane. I can't believe I'm still awake becuz of you. It's 4:49 AM.(76.20.90.53 (talk) 12:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Your missing the point of what I'm trying to say. Certain films have plot holes. It's a common occurrence. However, not knowing the answers to these particular questions, doesn't inhibit the understanding of the plot as a whole. The information already contained in the plot section is sufficient and concise. There's no need for an injection of all these minutiae. Moovi (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand what I'm saying? I have a theory about this movie. My theory has my Assumptions about some of the Events in this Movie. Would you be willing to listen to my theory? Can you tell me if my theory has Correct or Incorrect Details?(76.20.90.53 (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Try consulting the Reference Desk as you did or a plot spoiler website to correctly ascertain whether those details are correct. But whether they are, or not is irrelevant. Their placement doesn't belong on the article page. Moovi (talk) 13:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You better answer my questions or else I'll punch myself in the stomach & it'll be your fault. My theory is that Government Kites are Employees, who aren't supposed to open Delivery Suitcases. Is that right or wrong? My theory's that Director identified the Black Coat Person as Sheridan because Sheridan's fingerprints were on Gloves in Trash-Can. Right or wrong?(76.20.90.53 (talk) 02:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Problems with upload of File:XFileBluDiscc.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:XFileBluDiscc.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alien Nation Sound.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alien Nation Sound.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you recently removed some content from U.S. Marshals (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:44, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining your changes in your subsequent edit; greatly appreciated! DonIago (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AlienNdvd1988.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AlienNdvd1988.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]