User talk:Mootsticksi

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Azis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Azis was changed by Mootsticksi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871788 on 2014-07-16T02:53:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mootsticksi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mootsticksi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Western world, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Hi Mootsticksi, I noticed that you reverted the Western world article two times today. Your reversions have resulted in the removal of numerous contents from the article. Please discuss any disputed issue in the talk page of the article before before making the changes to the original text. Thank you. :-) --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 17:02, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Your recent editing history at Western world shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Western world. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Western world, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Mootsticksi, please discuss the issue in the talk page of the Western world article. You are removing valuable information from the article and have reverted three times within the last 24 hours. Please avoid engaging in an edit war and discuss the content dispute in the relevant article talk page. Also, please do not falsely accuse other editors of original research when the information has been properly cited and sourced. Thank you. :-) --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 17:12, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violating the 3RR even after being warned

Mootsticksi, please undo your revert in the Western world article and discuss the content dispute in the relevant talk pages or I'll report you to the admins and you might risk being blocked. Thank you. --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 17:22, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Western world has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Western world was changed by Mootsticksi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894444 on 2014-07-21T03:05:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:05, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop your disruptive editing in the Western world article

Please stop your disruptive editing in the Western world article. I have already added a citation for Australia being a torn country and another citation for the Council of Europe's advocation of democracy, human rights and the rule of law, which are fundamental western values. Furthermore, images should be added to the appropriate headers. The Council of Europe image is perfectly appropriate for the political section. Removal of such sourced content constitutes as vandalism. Your recent edits also constitute as reverts. --Nadia (Kutsuit) (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]