User talk:Mooooooooutray
August 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. – iridescent 18:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Moutray of Scotland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ʄlame 18:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. – iridescent 18:04, 7 August 2010 (UTC)unblock
[edit]Mooooooooutray (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
editing is a right not a privlige no fisherqueen or shrek reading this
Decline reason:
I disagree. Additionally, your violations of WP:SOCK are quite obvious. Your talk page access is now revoked. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 18:24, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.