User talk:Mooon FR

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Restoration Articles for deletion/Judith Sewell Wright

Hello everyone @User:Spiralwidget,@Oaktree b,@Alien333,@Isaidnoway,@Sal2100, @Cullen328,@SunTunnels,@Bexaendos. Please check the discussion on @OwenX page, I have made a complex analysis, to which I have found a number of media sources that can be annexed to the sources also presented by @Isaidnoway.

Comment

However, I did a complex analysis and identified a number of sources in the TV news. Because they are no longer available online I found them on YouTube. NewsChannel 5, The Early Show, CBS2 News, WPTZ.

Are any sources available at Chicago Tribune, WGN9, FOX32.

Thus based on the sources that were available in the article, as well as the sources that were presented by other editors in the deletion discussion and the sources that I have identified. We could rewrite the article and republish according to wikipedia policies. Mooon FR (talk) 15:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews, especially those that are part of the marketing campaign to promote a book, do not establish notability. Independent sources are required to establish notability, and interviews are not independent. Cullen328 (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to re-litigate the AfD discussion, but I did find part of the closer's rationale puzzling, specifically where they said: the Keep views ... hang their !vote ... – for coining the term "soft addiction", without providing any evidence that the term is, indeed, significant or new. I found that a little odd, considering coining the term literally means – any newly formed word, term, or phrase that nevertheless has achieved popular or institutional recognition and is becoming accepted into mainstream language.^[1] I guess I didn't think that coining the term needed to be explained. Having said that, I wouldn't bother trying to recreate the article, unless you can find WP:SIGCOV, and honestly, Wright is better off not having one, because having a WP article is certainly not a badge of honor. Isaidnoway (talk) 20:57, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would submit it as a draft for consideration, if you thing it meets notability; I'm not sure it does, but your mileage may vary. Oaktree b (talk) 23:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:33, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Will Parfitt (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Will Parfitt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mooon FR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Renouf, Antoinette (19 April 2018). "Investigating the Circumstances of Coinage". In Hoffmann, Sebastian; Sand, Andrea; Arndt-Lappe, Sabine; Dillmann, Lisa Marie (eds.). Corpora and Lexis. Language and Computers. Vol. 81. Brill Publishers. pp. 40–68. doi:10.1163/9789004361133_004. ISBN 978-90-04-36112-6.

[1] Renouf, Antoinette (19 April 2018). "Investigating the Circumstances of Coinage". In Hoffmann, Sebastian; Sand, Andrea; Arndt-Lappe, Sabine; Dillmann, Lisa Marie (eds.). Corpora and Lexis. Language and Computers. Vol. 81. Brill Publishers. pp. 40–68. doi:10.1163/9789004361133_004. ISBN 978-90-04-36112-6.

[1]