User talk:Moonraker0022/Archive 2

Moonraker0022 Talk Page Archive (July 2007 to June 2006)

Mary Lee Cagle

Hey, dude. Do you have any more information on Mary Lee Cagle? You created it, as you know, of course, but it's rather spare on information... at this point, it'd easily be deleted for a lack of content... Aepoutre (talk) 19:09, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! I'm often a lone editor out this way, haha. Yes, I was concerned that you might not have more, and this would end up as deleted. Glad to hear that's not the case! Aepoutre (talk) 19:59, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

Hey there, how's life out that way? I re-added a couple of the more relevant things. I did too much editorialising, true, but perhaps we can reach a compromise on including interesting and relevant information without too much of my commentary. :) Thoughts on the latest? If it seems too negative, feel free to try rewording it. I think I'd take out the word "still" in the note; I'm just too lazy to do it right now.... Aepoutre (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tourny.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Tourny.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 04:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2005 NAIA

No worries, I figured it was an error, that's what I was asking you to clarify, making sure it wasn't my terminal brain death showing its strength ;) TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 02:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NAIAJohn brown.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:NAIAJohn brown.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:41, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 2010 NAIA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament

I have nominated 2010 NAIA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 NAIA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 00:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:NAIAJohn_brown.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:NAIAJohn_brown.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 02:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2006_014.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2006_014.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Noms

Your recent additions to the WP:GAN list (2002 NAIA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament and 2001 NAIA Division I Men's Basketball Tournament) are not articles, so they cannot meet the Good Article criteria. They are closer to lists, so you might have some luck at Featured List nominations. I'm removing your noms for this reason. Thanks. Nikki311 14:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thunderhawk

I'll remove the picture. It just looks like a logo, really. I hope your new pics turn out better. I guess you know the Thunderhawk article has been merged into the Top Spin (ride) article (and rightly so, it's not notable). The Worlds of Fun article is pretty good these days, I think. --Skylights76 (talk) 18:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: deleted image

Hi, I'm assuming you're talking about Image:NAIAJohn brown.jpg? It was a picture of the 2005 NAIA Division I men's basketball championship team, and I deleted it because it was missing source and copyright information. If you can tell me where you found the image, I can undelete it, with a couple caveats. Please get back to me on my talkpage if you need any help. east.718 at 09:14, April 14, 2008

That image wasn't deleted, but was moved to Wikimedia Commons, where all wikis can use it. It's located at commons:Image:Thunderhawk night.jpg. east.718 at 01:35, April 15, 2008

Southern Nazarene University template

Moonraker, almost all of the links here are redlinks. It's almost a testament to the non-notability of a Nazarene university. Why would you make something like this with all red links? I can understand redlinking a person or word, expecting someone to take up writing the article, but this is overwhelmingly bad.... ¡¿Por quééééééé?! Aepoutre (talk) 17:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Church of the Nazarene conventions

Hey, thanks for the info about the SNU template earlier. Not to be patronising -- sorry if it comes across as such, but I thought about doing the same thing, so I wanted to check -- are you sure it was University of Maryland, Baltimore or was that just a guess? If it was a guess, I might be able to look into it, but perhaps you know quite well exactly where it was! Aepoutre (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the group picture is taken on their football field, and residents stayed in the dorms.Moonraker0022 (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tourny.gif

Image Copyright problem

Hi Moonraker0022!
We thank you for uploading Image:Tourny.gif, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 18:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Bartle Hall

Wow.. a reply over a year later! I had to go back and re-read the talk page just to remember what was going on. Anyways, I did a wee bit of searching, and I think the video you are thinking of is for the song "Last Night On Earth". Here's a Google search on the topic if you want to look up more: http://www.google.com/search?q=U2+%22Last+Night+On+Earth%22+video&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

It looks like you can find the video on YouTube. Dunno any more than that right now. Good luck! --Reverend Loki (talk) 22:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Human Sexuality

Moonraker0022, I am not sure why you are fighting so hard against having the Nazarene Church's view on Human Sexuality posted under Doctrines and Beliefs. This is a very important stance that the Church of the Nazarene has taken in this day and age. If we use your logic about what information should or should not be included, then there is a lot of information that we can start deleting, but I don't believe this is the answer. Wikipedia is designed to let individual user posts information that they believe is important to the topic and other users are not to delete the information unless inaccurate information is posted. So please stop vandalizing the Church of the Nazarene Article.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Church_of_the_Nazarene" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.215.122.43 (talk) 06:07, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unregistered user, Moonraker has a good point, even if I do not always agree with that user's edits on Wikipedia. If you'd like to talk about the issue, and feel strongly about it, I urge you to register rather than post as an unregistered user. Aepoutre (talk) 16:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]