User talk:Moody2019

October 2020

Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Idrissa Niang have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 02:08, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am doing my duty well and explain the reasons, I think you see yourself as better than others. I hope you review yourself. Moody2019 (talk) 02:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Idrissa Niang. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ (talk) 00:47, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(removed PA)(talk) 11:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moody2019. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 05:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Black Kite (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Saif Jassim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saif Jassim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saif Jassim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 13:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Shawqi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Shawqi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Shawqi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]