User talk:MooCow1
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/TEST_-_Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Summer) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Summer_20) . |
GLB: There is no information on the page relating the GLB to Rico Actor Corrupt practices, bank frauds that use pension funds to leverage bad investments. The GLB was not designed to protect, but to con, defraud, siphon of pension funds, on the excuse that the credit placed was not rotating. (A well known Wells Fargo Credit fraud excuse that never takes into consideration that pension funds shall NOT rotate and shall NOT be used to inhibit Rico Actor Profiteering and hysteric investments due excessive losses OR excessive gains with no place to go. Note that the curve set is a sum of gauss curve, where both at the top and bottom the succesive changes are minor till quote the gaussian hump unquote is overcome. That does NOT happen for ceiling economies whom will merely drop down into a depressive cycle or complete collapse.
Add references to those effects and relationships, and the state senators whom pushed, undersigned, to hump up bad financial practices. Stanford, investor companies now in jail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.185.176.47 (talk) 09:32, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Spring) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Fall_2019) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Spring_2019) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Fall_2018) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Fall_2018) . |
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Spring) . |
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_California,_Berkeley/Berkeley_Interdisciplinary_Research_Group_on_Privacy_-_Coleman_Lab_(Fall_2017). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |
Hello MooCow1! Excited to see you work on Wikipedia soon in the Coleman Lab. Cheers, ClassybluepowerClassybluepower (talk) 08:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Hey there, this is your cohort saying hi!--Strillonator (talk) 00:10, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, MooCow1, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Moved page
[edit]Hi, I saw that you started making notes and plans in the mainspace at Talk:Post-mortem privacy, however you should only move content live once it is ready, meaning that it's a complete article that establishes notability for the topic. The reason for this is that moving it before it's ready puts the article at risk of getting deleted, even if it's only on the talk page. I've moved this to your userspace at User:MooCow1/Post-mortem privacy so you can work on it at your leisure. I recommend working on it in your userspace, as this gives you the time to work on expanding the information and improving it without fear of it being immediately deleted. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Peer Review by Xkwhvzde
[edit]I really like where your article is going! In the second sentence where you say (“in the status quo”) I think would benefit from more general/simple term. I think the intro would also benefit more from a more specific law(? If there are any). We’re still in the early stages so I know its probably just difficult to include all the information you might have not seen from further annotations yet. Your section look like they will include a lot of information. It goes without saying that this topic is pretty hefty. The law section feels like its going to be the biggest though it has less info than the rest of them. I really like that you separated things into bullet points. It made it a lot easier to read. I’m really looking forward to your article!
Xkwhvzde (talk) 04:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello MooCow1,
This is Tommytheprius (Maya)! I'm a junior at Cal where I'm studying Sociology and Economics. Some fun facts about me are that I love rewatching The Office, I enjoy baking, and I have a twin brother who also goes to UC Berkeley. I know you chose your Wikipedia username based of your love of cows, and I thought I'd choose mine based on something I loved too, in this case the 2006 silver Prius I had in high school, which I named Tommy. I'm looking forward to getting started with the project, and I'll see you at Lab on Friday! Tommytheprius (talk) 04:10, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
Introduction
[edit]Hi, I am Helen Simon. I am a dancer and a freshman at UC Berkeley hoping to major in economics or pre-haas! I am very passionate about research. My favorite food is Italian food. I look forward to researching about privacy in a topic TBD, as well as getting to know you all.
- Thanks for the introduction. Testing out the reply here. 2601:644:500:33C5:39C9:7258:4311:A8F5 (talk) 07:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Introductions: Hello from the Newbie!
[edit]Hello! Nice to be on your talk page. Happy to figure it out -- "again"?. See you soon.
2601:644:500:33C5:39C9:7258:4311:A8F5 (talk) 07:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm Billhpike. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Qualified Security Assessor have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 05:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Please avoid adding citation to websites that offer related commercial services. See WP:CITESPAM. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 05:58, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |