Jump to content

User talk:Montu1234567

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 04:08, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Montu1234567 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

can u please unblock? I have not done anything illegal in past 2 years. thanks. I follow Jainism and can increase the neutrality of Wikipedia as there are very few people who have jain point of view.Montu1234567 (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked as a sockpuppet, and thus will need to request an unblock on your original account. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 06:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Request to unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Montu1234567 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I cannot request unblock in original account (realphi) because my ability to write on the talk page is also blocked at the original account Montu1234567 (talk) 06:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you do not have talk page access at your original account, you should make a request via WP:UTRS, not here. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

[edit]

This is a check user block, so Checkuser needed here and at Realphi and I don't even know where. --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 07:33, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra: There's no basis for a CU request. You really should have notified Ponyo. TPA should probably be revoked, but I'll leave that to others.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]