Thanks for uploading File:RLN.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
I've already added this one to the 'exceptioned name list' [1]. So it is audible here too, automated: Template:IPA chart vowels with audio. Good you found & added that one. Since I am not an expert in IPA, can you explain why there is "unrounded" in the filename? To me the vowel-trapezium says the sound is in-between. -DePiep (talk) 23:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The terms "unrounded" and "rounded" refer to the rounding of the lips during the articulation of the vowel. The vowel is in-between in the trapezium because it is central, not because it is unrounded. Theoretically, there could be a near-open central rounded vowel, but I know of no language that contains one and it is most likely very rare cross-linguistically. This is why there is no official IPA symbol for it. Because its rounded counterpart is so rare, most of the time the word "unrounded" is omitted. The name of the sound file could probably be changed to match the article. --Montgolfière (talk) 15:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I understand the Central line, but I meant to point out that the vowel in the IPA chart () is not lefthand side, while the near-open front unrounded vowel æ is on the lefthand side of the bullet. So, clearly the rounded one is not used, but still then I'd expect this one to be on the lefthand side of a bullet. But maybe I am too theoretical, and is the phonetic world not that black-and-white. Anyway, if you know of other soundfiles not yet available in this, I'd like to know. -DePiep (talk) 20:56, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]
HI! I don't know how else to send you a message, but I would like to ask you about the map you updated on the wolf-pac page, could you either put it back on, or let me know how to update it if you wouldn't mind please?
Hi, about your additions to the Gospel of Marcion - there is one sentence that reads like original researcy or synthesis - "If the claims of the Church Fathers...then the relative priority..." - making an if/then statement sounds as if you have drawn your own conclusion; it may be based on sources, but is not explicitly stated by any of the sources - if there is a reference for this conclusion it would be a good idea to add it to the article; if there is no source for this conclusion it should be removed or reworded - also, there's a small formatting issue: the links for John Knox and Joseph B. Tyson have external links in the body of the text and according to Wikipedia:External links, external links "should not normally be placed in the body of an article" - hope this helps to improve your addition - cheers - Epinoia (talk) 17:44, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your recommendations! I just removed the sentence you mentioned and got rid of the external links. I had added the external links because originally they were dead links to non-existent Wikipedia pages, but not having a link at all is also fine. Montgolfière (talk) 18:07, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Newcomb's paradox into Evidential decision theory. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Gmirkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Newcomb's paradox into Evidential decision theory. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., 