User talk:Montchav

"Talk pages" were designed for a purpose: For talking. This user believes conversations should take place in the same place, and not be spread across multiple talk pages. This user will watch any pages whicb (s)he edtis, to keep the conversation in one place ! Thank you.

I've archived some of my old talk pages. --Montchav 16:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of public domain content for being a copyright violation

You deleted Index of cooperation for being a copyright violation. It is not. The web page that it is supposedly a copyright violation is the on-line version of Federal Standard 1037C, which is (mostly) a work of the United States government and thus not copyrighted. (See {{FS1037C}}.) It did say this at the bottom of the article. Please restore it. Uncle G (talk) 16:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What? I can't delete pages, I;m not an admin! --Montchav (talk) 15:03, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm confused. You're the editor who tagged it as a copyright violation. I meant this for the talk page of the administrator who deleted it. I followed the wrong hyperlink when looking at the deleted page history. Please note, though, what I said about FS1037C. Uncle G (talk) 01:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afd

The Afd for Thomas Oliver (husband of Bridget Bishop) is appearing as a red link on the article page. I thought you would like to know. --Stormbay (talk) 23:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for Rollback

You might want to go change your typo from "twinkie" to "twinkle". Dustihowe Talk 20:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swiss Olympiad in Informatics

Hi. You forgot to do the last step: adding the AfD to today's log page. I've done it for you. For future reference, the instructions are at {{AfD footer}}. Sandstein (talk) 22:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to. User:DumbBOT does it for me every time. --Montchav (talk) 01:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Alan Fox

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Richard Alan Fox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Richard Alan Fox. Deb (talk) 17:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taip arba Ne

Saw your (stricken) note. The article would be notable if it quoted audience numbers from a reputable source (and it was a significant audience) and if there are any references to the show which have appeared in popular culture. Otherwise it might be better to note the show's existence and range of prizes (assuming it's really the same show) in the article dealing with the original. /PētersV (talk) 18:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rate Your Students

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rate Your Students, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rate Your Students. Thank you. W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Montchav! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 180 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jean-Michel Lesage - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Jens Byggmark - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Hannes Trinkl - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thomas Sykora - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Angers Agglo map.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Angers Agglo map.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:53, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nwft

Template:Nwft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.. QED237 (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]