User talk:Monsoongetback

Glassheart

Thank you for attempting to make a constructive edit to Glassheart, Leona Lewis's third studio album. I have reverted your recent edits because they constitute WP:Original research. You have made assumptions about when the new single and/or album will be released based on when a previous single/album was released and in the process you removed sourced and/or verified information. You made an assumption that because a prior single ("Happy") was released two months prior in the US that the same thing would happen with "Trouble". There is no evidence to support this. "Collide" was released in the UK before it was released in the US. Wikipedia should be verifiable and so the most verified information we have is that "Trouble" will be released in October. We should focus on what we do know and not report what we dont. Speculation belongs on blogs. Until there is an earlier release date confirmed by a reliable source please do not make such an edit again. Thanks. If you have any questions feel free to ask. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:03, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Chapter V (Trey Songz album): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 05:14, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to the page Brandy Norwood discography appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Oz ^talk 22:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Afrodisiac. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Afrodisiac was changed by Monsoongetback (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883128 on 2012-07-21T18:32:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Use of reliable sources

Please don't replace information from reliable sources (as defined in the reliable sources policy) with information from other sources. If you insist on doing so, if conflict with other users, you may find yourself being temporarily blocked from editing to prevent further similar edits. -- The Anome (talk) 12:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop replacing reliably sourced text with misinterpreted information like you did at Talk That Talk (song). If you continue doing so, you may be blocked from editing without prior warning. De728631 (talk) 12:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also our rule about reverting the edits of other contributors. No editor must undo more than three edits by other contributors within 24 hours. Exceeding this limit results in what we call "edit warring" and may also lead to the contributors being blocked. De728631 (talk) 12:37, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for continued edit-warring

I see you're still engaged in edit warring with other editors, so I've temporarily blocked you from editing. When the block expires, you are welcome to resume editing, provided you stick to making edits that comply with Wikipedia's policies, including the reliable sources and edit reversion policies.

In particular, if you want to use http://acharts.us/ as a reference in preference to other well known existing reliable sources, you must demonstrate that it meets the reliable sources policy.

Please note that your block from editing does not prevent you from editing this talk page. -- The Anome (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]