User talk:Monserrrr

Welcome!

Hi Monserrrr! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Name Omitted (talk) 14:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries needed

Hi I've noticed a few of your edits and I'm uncertain as to accuracy. For example this edit appears partly correct and partly incorrect after I read the source. Edit summaries are needed and if you're working from another source then you need to provide that source - otherwise others will check the source that is already there and conclude you are incorrect. Thanks. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Im updating taxonomic information on Wikipedia. A lot of it is outdated. Sorry for not sourcing. Monserrrr (talk) 19:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries. I've seen you working on the List of mammals of ... series and I can't tell why you are making some changes. Edit summaries are part of how Wikipedians communicate and know what is a good change and what is vandalism. Thank you. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I still need to form that habit Monserrrr (talk) 03:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 04:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN

Please stop making changes such as this one per WP:NOTBROKEN. Both taxonomy terms are widely used. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Going off ASM ([1]). Even if both are used, then my edits should not matter. Monserrrr (talk) 01:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, read WP:NOTBROKEN. The edits you are making are disruptive and you will be blocked if you continue. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 01:34, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I'll change others which aren't debated. Monserrrr (talk) 01:35, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN (x2)

As User:Ohnoitsjamie said, you are still making edits such as this and this (amongst many others) which are contrary to the principles outlined at WP:NOTBROKEN and which are disruptive.

--Mychemicalromanceisrealemo (talk) 13:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The edits are NOT disruptive, and the eastern and red wolves have been split off as their own species for a while now. I am updating the taxonomies on these pages. Monserrrr (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In both those cases, we have sources that indicate that both are used. Unless you have good sourcing that establishes that is no longer the case, you need to stop making these changes or else you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Define "good sourcing". Don't be vague. Monserrrr (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A reliable source that indicates that the name you are changing it to is the only one in use; it should reflect what's on the target page for the organism as well. You're making plenty of other good edits; stick to those, and stop removing synonyms without providing a reason.OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll add sources from here on out. I believe ASM is a good enough source Monserrrr (talk) 17:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For cases where there is disputed nomenclature, it's not sufficient to include a source from one side and declare that to be canon. For any cases where multiple names are still in use, I highly suggest you leave them alone. There are plenty of other edits you can make that won't result in you getting blocked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You must agree that the red wolf's taxonomy has had consensus reached, no? I believe you saw the discussion I linked in my edit summary. Monserrrr (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected sock

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ddum5347 (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ddum5347 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ddum5347. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 00:10, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]