User talk:Monkeynutbar

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Monkeynutbar}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Problems with upload of File:Videoplasty.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Videoplasty.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Horrible Swill

The article Horrible Swill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NALBUM (video is non-notable) and WP:V (article is unsourced)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DKqwerty (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. DKqwerty (talk) 14:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of A Concert by the Lake

The article A Concert by the Lake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Despite the big names, this video has not been noted in enough reliable third-party publications. Also, there should be an article about Band du Lac, which itself would have to pass the notability test before products like this are eligible for articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I actually started the page as an article for Band du Lac themselves, but got sidetracked by the DVD. The band are notable under WP:BAND criterion 6, so I assumed the DVD would be too, but after reading WP:NALBUMS I guess not. I've moved it out of article space for now so I can reuse some of it for the BdL page, and I'll put it up for speedy deletion when I'm done. Is that a good compromise? Monkeynutbar (talk) 00:01, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Family Guy DVDs

In regards to your edit summary the episode pages Family Guy (season 3) for example, use one color for the whole page. Please note, there isn't different colors between each episode listed. You had many different colors in close fashion which made it very distracting to read. CTJF83 06:57, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually referring to the main list of Family Guy episodes page (and most other list of episodes pages), where there's a different colour for each season that are (mostly) based on the DVD covers, and where they have summaries they're each divided by a line of colour, so they're the theories I applied to the DVD page. But I do take your point, that's why I took them out before re-applying my edits. Sorry for being so curt in the summary, but it was just that the colours weren't the only change I made, and it was quite annoying to see the whole thing reverted just for the sake of one aspect. If it gets reverted again for another reason, so be it. No hard feelings. - Monkeynutbar (talk) 07:31, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ya, sorry, I was being lazy. No hard feelings here. :) Plus, I've been here almost 5 years and hate messing with colors/tables, so you know more about it then I do. CTJF83 17:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jilly Vs Chilli

Hello, Monkeynutbar. You have new messages at Cheesesailor's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Comic Book Men

Hi. Regarding your edits to Comic Book Men, what material in the article was a copyright violation? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 06:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was just in reference to my last edit to the podcast section. The descriptions for episodes 4 and 5 were lifted from the SModcast site, with the only change being the addition of "Jack's Guy" to Rob Bruce's name. (Incidentally, so was the description for episode 6 until you changed it.) My previous edit was just for consistency, as the first 3 episode summaries only briefly mention the main plot and describe some of the customers while #6 went into detail about the plot and didn't mention any customers. I just forgot to add an edit summary to that one. Sorry for the confusion. -- Monkeynutbar (talk) 08:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

S'Okay. Just asking. :-) Nightscream (talk) 13:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. -- Monkeynutbar (talk) 15:51, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Charlie Brooker Hollywood Sign.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Charlie Brooker Hollywood Sign.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. mabdul 15:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited List of Comic Book Men episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AMC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Comic Book Men episodes

Alright. :-) Nightscream (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is the most "significant" part of an episode is obviously subject to opinion. The convention I've developed over the past few years of working on the List of Pawn Stars episodes article is to first list the items appraised, since that is what takes up the majority of the episode's running time, and not the soft-scripted aspect of it, which get a small mention in the first two Acts, and then the payoff in the episode's final moments. I don't know if the hypothetical question of "which episode is that" is really applicable, given the content and structure of these types of reality shows. Moreover, some of these plots arise from or are inspired by the encounters that shop staff have with the customers, as with the "Ghostbusting at the Stash" episode, which is why adding the scripted aspect afterwards can make more sense. As for AMC's descriptions, they probably uses the scripted portion in their description because that's the only aspect of an episode that lends itself to a plot description, as opposed to just a list of items. But that doesn't mean that that is what an episode is "about", or that it's more "significant". I agree with consistency, and have been fairly consistent throughout this season, and I intend to go back and do the same for the first.

Yes, a few bytes is not much. I have no problems with bandwidth or loading times, and since I do all or most of the current writing of the synopses, having all the different values' information easy to discern at a glance is helpful.

I apologize for the podcast info; I didn't realize that I removed some information when I reverted the format. I tried to restore what I think was the removed podcast info just now; let me know if it worked. Nightscream (talk) 19:16, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean "significant" as any kind of judgement over content or anything, just that the soft-scripted part usually takes up a more "significant" amount of screen time. Usually about half of the episode is dedicated to it, whereas the other items each get only 2 or 3 minutes coverage. Plus, as I said, they're what gives each episode its title. Also, the question of "what episode is that" should indeed be considered when writing these short summaries. Keep in mind that there are 2 types of people reading these pages: those who want a (more or less) full synopsis and will gladly read as much as you give them, and those who just want to identify the episodes and don't want to read through a whole paragraph each time for what amounts to one sentence worth of information. It's the same reason why articles have ledes.

You may not have any problems with bandwidth or loading time, I may not either (in general), but not everyone has broadband, and some that do have a limit to how much they can download within a specific period. Also, I don't know about you, but occasionally my connection can just go to shit for no reason, and it will take a ridiculous amount of time to load a simple page. My point is that while a few bytes may not seem like much, that's, say, and extra 50 bytes per template, per page view, and it can add up.

But whatever. We've already spent too much time discussing this rather minor issue. Do what you think's best. --Monkeynutbar (talk) 04:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The soft-scripted part does not take up half of the episode. Most of the episode is usually taken up by the appraisal of the items brought in or purchased by customers. Often the soft-scripted portion of the plot isn't even clear to me until the final Act or end of the episode. By contrast, when I write the summaries while watching the episodes, the first things that go in are the appraised items. This is the convention I've used for years in the Pawn Stars articles, and I think the person writing the synopses should be given some leeway on this.

I didn't say that the question of "what episode is that" should not be considered. I said that I don't think it's applicable. Allow me to clarify: I do not know that fans of the series reference the episodes according to plots the way that they do with fully-scripted TV series, and if they do, that they do so according to the soft-scripted portions of them. That's a presumption.

I'm going to maintain the template arrangement in a way that facilitates easy writing and discernment at a glance. Sorry, but I'm not going to change that over 50 bytes. But if a consensus of the community makes it clear they do not want this, then I'll abandon that practice.

Regarding the podcast, can you link me to the diff in question? I usually do that in discussions like this because it makes it clear to the other editor which edit I'm referring to. I thought I had restored the material that I had previously removed. Sorry if I didn't do so entirely. Nightscream (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ghostbusters Score.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ghostbusters Score.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mykaell Riley

The article Mykaell Riley has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —C.Fred (talk) 14:56, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghostbusters II Soundtrack.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ghostbusters II Soundtrack.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DBZFan30 (talk) 19:52, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ghostbusters Score.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ghostbusters Score.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]